Many of my CA educator colleagues have expressed the belief that the mania for book banning is unlikely to happen here. After all, it’s California: free thought, free speech, etc
Check out this report from Orange County.
Where efforts to capture local school boards and are effective, it can happen. School systems and libraries have existing policies for materials review. These efforts are about circumventing existing policies by fiat.
Please Share: Recruiting for Senior Editor (STEM Education)
Cogent Education - Applications Due Feb 6 - Role formally begins March 2023.
🧐 Teens in abusive relationships are 4-6x more likely to become pregnant.
⭐ February is National Teen Dating Violence Awareness Month.
❓ What are your schools during this important awareness month?
#TDVAM #TDVAM2023 #publichealth #abuse #domesticviolence @edutooters @sociology @academicchatter
With the announcement of the new #ChatGPT text classifier OpenAI also published a new page in their documentation library specifically aimed at educators.
https://platform.openai.com/docs/chatgpt-education
The word #privacy appears only once.
They say that student privacy is a concern.
[rageface]
Congratulations to Exxon Mobile for earning $56 billion net profit in 2022. Against all odds, they found a way to make record profits
$6.3 million per hour
$1,750 per second
But don’t worry. That didn’t stop Exxon Mobil from getting subsidies from our government. Since FY2000
Texas gave them $1.4 Billion
Louisiana: $500 Million
The federal government: $5.4 Billion in bailout money
Does anyone want to know why we are speedrunning to climate crisis?
One thing I am absolutely not worried about ChatGPT doing is humanizing instruction or helping build classroom community.
Can't wait for every uni to buy an enterprise subscription while immiserating their adjuncts even more
Trying not to shed tears from the overwhelm I’ve caused myself based on where I am research-wise and where I should be. #realthoughts #phdlife
I should have also said that I appreciate the idea of "good faith effort" because of the different circumstances and backgrounds students have, and realities they have to deal with, so that what a good faith effort looks like for one person may look different for another.
✨ NEW OPEN ACCESS RESEARCH ARTICLE ✨
Want to learn how to design #SciEd instruction that engages youth in the speculative design of AI and other technologies to promote #RacialJustice?
Check out this 🔥 work led by Kathleen Arada and Anastasia Sanchez!
✨ Youth as pattern makers for racial justice: How speculative design pedagogy in science can promote restorative futures through radical care practices ✨
🌿 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10508406.2022.2154158
#NGSS #NGSSchat #CSforAll #MultipleWaysOfKnowing @edutooters
@ungrading #Ungrading #edutooter
I have really taken up a term that a student shared last semester as it relates to framing ungrading.
A frequent challenge and question is what is good enough from a student work perspective?
The student shared that he consistently focused on giving a "good faith effort" which is interesting in that students often share that they could have done more, and feel they could have done more (can't we all say that about anything?)
I really like the personal and collective accountability that comes with looking at, and thinking about "good faith effort."
There's evidence of social-class bias in teachers' assessments, but there's also a systemic component: https://bit.ly/3GJQOdx. It's not just individual attitudes but the type & purpose of assessment itself: When teachers must use grades (that can "select the best students") rather than feedback (to "help students learn"), their evaluations unconsciously favor privileged students.
Thus, an emphasis on "meritocratic selection might actually contribute to the reproduction of social inequalities."
I ended class by framing an assignment for individuals and groups to conceptualize and design a disruptive encounter for a specific everyday context. This is our first effort as a class to take up an educational design stance in response to the subject matter of the course or our own life experiences.
The goal is for individuals to select an injustice to disrupt in some creative way in an everyday encounter or context. It could be a provocative thought, a counter-story, a conversation, etc.
STEM teacher educator. Humanizing teaching and learning. Believer of student brilliance. Luddite. Disbeliever of silver bullets. Nobody is coming to save us. #Edutoot #Ungrading #STEMed
@ungrading @STEMed