poor people hate the rich and remain poor and often childless.
broke people work for the rich and their kids are better off.
hate brings hate
love brings love
money doesn't care about your feelings
We are going to audit the AI.
Normal stuff to us. We audited Hell and Lucifer without any issues. You lack understanding of who we are, what we do, and why we care.
@FourOh-LLC@pkteerium.xyz AI is an extension of the hubris of man, it should be treated like an idiot not a god.
@jeff @FourOh-LLC But what about gods? The same applies...
@admitsWrongIfProven@qoto.org @FourOh-LLC@pkteerium.xyz i can experience god for free, AI requires a subscription
@jeff @FourOh-LLC Not so - lots of llm generated crap is smeared all over the internet. You can experience that without any subscription... and that's a problem.
@admitsWrongIfProven@qoto.org @FourOh-LLC@pkteerium.xyz electricity costs money
god does not
@jeff @FourOh-LLC Well being in one's own fantasy is more eco friendly, that much is surely true.
@admitsWrongIfProven@qoto.org @FourOh-LLC@pkteerium.xyz reality is 99% fantasy because of just how little we can actually perceive
Its is the differences between us, individuals, who paint reality for anything else.
The Communists "believe" we live in a limitless Universe. The do not "believe" that the Universe if full of immutable properties your mind, your perception, your faith cannot change. They "believe" poverty is a problem with a solution - and they refuse to recognize that one of the immutable properties of poverty is self-inflicted.
We build educational institutions to paint a better picture of reality. At least it used to be that way, until the mentally ill and the delusional overrun them.
Next time, before you attack something that is evidencing ITSELF to be functional (maybe not ideal, but at least its functional) focus on you EVIDENCING your Reality to function on the same level or better.
Work on EVIDENCING that Universial Minimum Wage going to create the same motivation to work in demanding and sometimes perilous occupations as a Living Wage creates. Show me that people who get food, shelter and medicine without making any effort are willing to train and work as effectively and reliably as those who do it for a Living Wage.
@FourOh-LLC @jeff Reversal of the burden of proof rejected.
So far all I know is lack of evidence, in the arguments of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortex who is a Champaign Socialist, lost thousands of jobs by chasing employers out of New York City, who is getting wealthier by the day and wears "Eat the Rich" designer dress.
In real life their is no such thing as "proof of burden", in real life real criminals get rich and powerful.
You need to show me that I am not seeing "reality" for what it is...
@FourOh-LLC @jeff I mean i could mute you, but it is more entertaining not to. You mix so much stuff together without any real explanation, it's art.
Out of curiousity, where do you think i am from?
At least admit that currently of the motivations would be to win a patent, recover the cost, and make profit.
I do not want to read thousands of pages of explanation, listen to podcasts and watch any video.
Build a star-ship, a hydrogen reactor, cure cancer - and show that you did not do this for fame, money and power.
@FourOh-LLC @jeff You're a riot! I may not be able to understand what you talk about as it's too unconnected to anything in the thread before, but i dig the absolute chaos you unleash! You should be given a tv show and a nice budget for special effects, also several Giraffes.
"Dadaist utopia", i would call it.
We cannot practically showcase the first, but we CAN and DO practically showcase Ohm's Law. Every battery-based electric vehicle is handicapped by Ohm's Law, as the increased current required to balance the increasing number of cells are approaching the point where its no longer PRACTICAL.
ChatGPT keeps arguing that "advancement in battery technologies" going to change the fundamental limitations.
Proving that ChatGPT ignores "reality" is not that difficult.
Convincing people that they live in a delusion is far more difficult.
@FourOh-LLC @jeff Hmm, you're becoming a bit too coherent to be entertaining, but since you chose two random unconnected topics instead of many this time, i think i'll indulge one of them.
The lizard in my pocket (You said ChatGPT, but it's functionally the same) says many things, but is not actually intelligent. I'm focussing on self reflection here, so what i would not expect from the lizard in my pocket is to reflect on the meaning of its words. It's just a random remix of words that are known to be likely to be said, any new idea would be completely random.
What results from this is that i could replace the lizard in my pocket with a simple script that brought up previous works. It is not actually contributing, it is just another way of ingress for existing ideas.
So the examples of physics that we can and cannot practically demonstrate at home does not actually connect to this.
