@ambulocetus Actually no in many modern 'topsy turvy' logics which has been developed to keep you more ok if you don't do those things and actually supply your physical needs best down that line.

Ideally yes (about what you said) but by design you are committing near suicide starting down the path that ultimately rejects the hand that feeds you (very badly and spiritually doesn't care at all).

So this comment is imagining your comment was direct to those less aware people saying it's better - no it's a hard rocky road from what has been restricted and sterilised that were are trying to grow back full of other sterilised people, much who actively don't want (even on a plate I see it's a choice people make) so I would say it's more spiritual or the right thing from the point to accept whichever way is a losing way, and this or that way has more chance of bringing about better things more often but the constant battle of education and egos, alignment with family will find you rejection sooner than the world (but hopefully some agreement) and in long term weaving the like-minded AND allowing the less like-minded together is something to aim for.

One reason I say this is that people appreciate honesty or not selling any false dream so saying anything is 'better' can be good but saying we accept what best we can do with what we have together without the uncaring people is more the reality and slow curve.

Hope this made sense to allow others to see reality is what we want to serve them and get to work rather than kind of "this way will be better for you and your family" when in many ways it's not once you're "too aware" and need to make sure those around are onbaord somewhat or slowly ask what they thing, then make plans to suddenly move away from them to others as family is often a restriction as well as safety net or false mini-community.