@bibliolater @bookstodon in general, for me retention and understanding of a text is decidedly best from a physical book, then ebook and finally audio (I only listen to audiobooks for fiction, and preferably not too complex ones).

@jarulf @bookstodon I too prefer to a physical for this purpose. I find like you, that are not ideal for in-depth understanding and retention.

@bibliolater @jarulf @bookstodon That is interesting I wonder why the difference between physical and ebook for retention. I only buy physical books for recipes, reading a physical book with my shoulder pain is too much usually. But now wondering if eg history or science books I should consider trying physical sometimes?

(I generally don't do audio-anything - I get too easily distracted - I really need video for any audio type stuff so audiobooks are not really for me usually)

I remember this article from 2013 and it was bad back then. It goes back and forth between #EInk and regular screens as if these are related. They are not.

We all know that computer screens make for an awful reading experience. Before I got an #EReader I read a single book an a screen. I rarely read paperbooks today.

I got a decade of highlights from my ebooks available and yesterday my reading app told me I've 30 hrs left on my current book series.

@bibliolater @picard @jarulf @bookstodon

Follow

@oligneisti @picard @jarulf @bookstodon Thank you for commenting on the toot. I can see that you didn't like it then and you don't like it now. Do you think that electronic readers have made such a difference? Personally I find that having a physical book with pages and ink that I touch helps me to retain information better than even an e-reader screen.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.