Show newer

@thor you could try something like this on your balcony waspinator.co.uk/ (or just use a stuffed paper bag). it seems to work here, not many wasps this year.

@PraxisOfEvil it's your money in the first place. the government is just a protection racket.

@velartrill
> tho come to think of it it might be possible to do something like, the client process creates its own receiver queue, then sends a message to the server with that queue's ID, then the server could use msgctl(IPC_STAT) to get the receiver queue creator pid and uid

from my limited knowledge it sounds like a good solution

> that would be pretty minimally nasty for a system that involves two-way communication, tho doesn't solve the problem for fire-and-forget messages alas

maybe just open seperate queues for them too? shouldn't cost that much and you may just wrap that into a helper function

@Stridermcperson two year olds don't need shitty sUpErHerOeS, they'll make up _much_ more interesting things by themselves if you just let them.

and _nobody_, regardless of age, needs shady politicians as heroes. _every_ politician is crooked.

@velartrill i can't think of a reason why _i_ would need the message queues, but that doesn't mean anything :D

buuuut github.com/torvalds/linux/blob
the pid seems to be included! at least from what i see with my limited kernel knowledge :)

@velartrill what kind of message queue? i don't think that is functionality things like activeMQ etc. have

I hate this argument I was home schooled my entire educational career and my only issue was meeting people after that though I didn’t suffer socially

RT @SallyMayweather@twitter.com

🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/SallyMayweather/status/1431291226859397127

vllt. sollte fefe erstmal 50kg abnehmen bevor er zeug erzählt dass ungeimpfte alleine zum sterben in den wald gehn sollen. da könnte er sich ja auch aus freien stücken zu entscheiden :)

@velartrill it's all in the modules imho, numpy etc. that's the thing why python is so popular @skadi

@skadi i think especially teaching python as "simple" and "beginner friendly" is severely misguided. so many glued-on ideas (decorators, weird getter setter stuff, etc.), strings and encoding still insane. i know i'm pretty alone with it, but python 2 was much "better" imo. still not great but they completely lost me with python3k.

@velartrill

@velartrill The fact that people still write and teach Python when objectively superior languages like Go and Lua exist is mind boggling

Like how could anyone think it's a good idea to use a language with multiple mutually incompatible versions

Ime debugging a Python environment is a good hazing ritual to appreciate the simplicity of C

hot covid take 

@ente
> Simple: There is a simple general election at the end of september, so no one wnats to annoy their voters.

politicians don't care after the polls are closed :)

further, i think it’s high time we take measures against things.

Show older
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.