Show newer
JUST IN - European Central Bank asks some lenders to monitor social media for early signs of bank runs.

https://www.disclose.tv/id/ie3fqnc67s/

tja fefe, wer nicht im moloch wohnt bekommt auch pakete pünktlich. bei mir ists sogar oft mal zu früh xD

Unabhängig davon, dass Strafgerichte noch nie die geeigneten Kompetenzen für politischen Einschätzungen waren, liegt es auch nicht in deren Mandat, solche Meinungen öffentlich kundzutun. Ein Richter hat einzuschätzen, ob ein justiziabler Vorgang vorliegt. Dass die Richterin sich ihre politische Einschätzung dennoch nicht verkneift, zeigt gerade ihre Befangenheit und mangelnde Neutralität, bestätigt damit wider Willens die Relevanz der Mahnungen, die sie abwerten will.

Show thread

Viele von uns haben sich einst das 'Präventivparadoxon' erklären lassen und den Begriff fortan jedem an den Kopf geknallt, der die totalitäre Art, wie Maßnahmen ergriffen und durchgesetzt wurden, nicht von den tatsächlichen Ereignissen gedeckt sah.
Heute verzichtet ein Gericht auf ein politisches Urteil gegen einen Warner vor Totalitarismus, will dies aber als Beweis dafür verstanden wissen, dass es dieser Warnung überhaupt nicht bedarf.
Achtung Test! - Tja, reingefallen.
seniora.org/politik-wirtschaft

@Moon @mikoto

throwawayboeingN704AL
January 16, 2024

Current Boeing employee here – I will save you waiting two years for the NTSB report to come out and give it to you for free: the reason the door blew off is stated in black and white in Boeings own records. It is also very, very stupid and speaks volumes about the quality culture at certain portions of the business.
A couple of things to cover before we begin:
Q1) Why should we believe you? A) You shouldn’t, I’m some random throwaway account, do your own due diligence. Others who work at Boeing can verify what I say is true, but all I ask is you consider the following based on its own merits.
Q2) Why are you doing this? A) Because there are many cultures at Boeing, and while the executive culture may be throughly compromised since we were bought by McD, there are many other people who still push for a quality product with cutting edge design. My hope is that this is the wake up call that finally forces the Board to take decisive action, and remove the executives that are resisting the necessary cultural changes to return to a company that values safety and quality above schedule.
With that out of the way… why did the left hand (LH) mid-exit door plug blow off of the 737-9 registered as N704AL? Simple- as has been covered in a number of articles and videos across aviation channels, there are 4 bolts that prevent the mid-exit door plug from sliding up off of the door stop fittings that take the actual pressurization loads in flight, and these 4 bolts were not installed when Boeing delivered the airplane, our own records reflect this.

The mid-exit doors on a 737-9 of both the regular and plug variety come from Spirit already installed in what is supposed to be the final configuration and in the Renton factory, there is a job for the doors team to verify this “final” install and rigging meets drawing requirements. In a healthy production system, this would be a “belt and suspenders” sort of check, but the 737 production system is quite far from healthy, its a rambling, shambling, disaster waiting to happen. As a result, this check job that should find minimal defects has in the past 365 calendar days recorded 392 nonconforming findings on 737 mid fuselage door installations (so both actual doors for the high density configs, and plugs like the one that blew out). That is a hideously high and very alarming number, and if our quality system on 737 was healthy, it would have stopped the line and driven the issue back to supplier after the first few instances. Obviously, this did not happen. Now, on the incident aircraft this check job was completed on 31 August 2023, and did turn up discrepancies, but on the RH side door, not the LH that actually failed. I could blame the team for missing certain details, but given the enormous volume of defects they were already finding and fixing, it was inevitable something would slip through- and on the incident aircraft something did. I know what you are thinking at this point, but grab some popcorn because there is a plot twist coming up.
The next day on 1 September 2023 a different team (remember 737s flow through the factory quite quickly, 24 hours completely changes who is working on the plane) wrote up a finding for damaged and improperly installed rivets on the LH mid-exit door of the incident aircraft.

A brief aside to explain two of the record systems Boeing uses in production. The first is a program called CMES which stands for something boring and unimportant but what is important is that CMES is the sole authoritative repository for airplane build records (except on 787 which uses a different program). If a build record in CMES says something was built, inspected, and stamped in accordance with the drawing, then the airplane damn well better be per drawing. The second is a program called SAT, which also stands for something boring and unimportant but what is important is that SAT is *not* an authoritative records system, its a bullentin board where various things affecting the airplane build get posted about and updated with resolutions.
@bonifartius and when you talk to them they're even stiffer than a puritan, I'm sure

i'm always surprised how many polar opposites fit into the mind of certain people as "good".

@mcread

While the German government deforest hole landscapes for their absolutely nonsensical windpower and solar parks.

Yeah right, the greenys are just utterly idiotic. Fuck them.

Are there any #emacs users from Poland here? :)

Show older
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.