Follow

@chrismessina

Yes they do, but that's not the correct approach IMO - it identifies the page as a journal, the company as a publisher, and it omits the author. Neither is correct: authorship is a hybrid of prompt, AI, and data; the site is not a journal, but a communication channel like an eMail; and OpenAI is not a publisher since they have no specific agency in the process - and actually exclude accountability via their TOS.

The IMO correct approach is to define a NEW category "Synthesized Communication" and structure the genertaed text like a "Personal Communication":

@misc{chatgpt_2023,
author = {ChatGPT},
title = {Synthesized Communication},
howpublished = {\url{chat.openai.com/chat}},
note = {Accessed on 2023-02-01},
}

🙂

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.