Interesting "how much would ChatGPT increase the speed it takes to do XYZ job" Twitter thread.
(The paper's authors use the phrase "exposure" to mean 'whether access to a GPT or GPT-powered system would reduce the time required for a human to perform a task by at least 50%'.)
Hard to tell this point which jobs are just going to need less people to do them, and which jobs will just get done faster…
Source: https://twitter.com/rubinovitz/status/1637651591191842816
#AI #LLM #MachineLearning #ChatGPT #Automation #OpenAI #Robots
Dave - I found an interesting comment on economic consequences of AI in a Twitter thread a few days ago (though I forget where). The argument goes as follows.
-------
Company A will reduce their staff by 50% for the same output and save costs.
Company B will keep their staff, increase productivity by 100% and gain market share.
Company B wins.
-------
It's a bit of different thinking about this topic.
The reality will be a mixed scenario, but some version of cost-cutting and increased productivity will play out. It's only Company C who loses out.
$ 0.02
@boris_steipe that's really interesting! Yes, I can absolutely see it playing out like this in different industries…