Follow


Name: GRACE-REC

Spatial coverage: global

Spatial resolution: 0.5 degrees

Temporal coverage: MSWEP-based reconstruction 1979-2016, ERA5-based 1979-present, GSWP3-based 1901-2014

Temporal resolution: Monthly (100 ensemble members for each combination of the three meteorological datasets and two GRACE satellite mascons), daily (ensemble mean only)

Gap-free: Yes

Year of publication: 2019

Algorithm: (1) linear water storage model, driven by temperature and precipitation, calibrated against de-seasonalized, de-trendedd GRACE satellite data (2002-2017), (2) spatial autoregressive model was used to generate an ensemble of spatially autocorrelated residuals, to facilitate uncertainty propagation from grid-level to regional or global averages. This method to propagate uncertainty is noteworthy.

Pros: outperforms hydrological and land surface models when evaluated against de-seasonalized, de-trended GRACE terrestrial water data, sea-level budget, basin-scale water balance, and streamflow.

Cons: The trends in GRACE-REC is purely driven by precipitation changes, therefore missing a ton of relevant factors (evapotranspiration change, dams, human water withdrawal, ice melt...). The seasonality is constant and not particularly reliable, either.

essd.copernicus.org/articles/1

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.