No, Vivado, probe9 is very clearly *defined*. It's in your *autogenerated* instantiation template.
I do get there's a problem. But that error message is pure BS. It's misleading af.
Follow
Well, there *was* a problem. In that in the instantiation statement I wrote `probe9 <= xyz` instead of `probe9 => xyz`.
That's a clear syntax error.
What was the syntax checker doing? Nothing. No squiggly red line.
