"...CIHR requested proposals for a CA$90 million funding program.... it came with a twist. After peer review, two additional committees, one of which included senior civil servants who did not necessarily have scientific training, made the... funding decisions, based on whether the proposals aligned with the government’s Biomanufacturing and Life Sciences Strategy. In some cases... proposals with lower scores from peer reviewers jumped ahead of those with better scores." science.org/content/article/ca

And more "A spokesperson for CIHR says applications were rated on how well they addressed one of several strategic objectives, including better preparing Canada to respond to pandemics. But those objectives were not listed in the original call for proposals."

This is the very worst way to fund science—to get peer review, then ignore it; to judge proposals based on secret criteria; to allow perceived strategic value to trump scientific quality. It's frankly sickening.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.