"The recognition that failure needs to be normalized for postdocs and PhD students has gained traction over the past decade, with highly successful scientists and researchers publishing their ‘CVs of failure’."
@cyrilpedia Maybe instead we could focus on creating a system that doesn't set young researchers up to fail? Grant funding rates are abysmal - it makes it hard to learn from feedback when you don't get an early success, and it's demoralising +++
@katejjeffery I like systems that introduce a lottery step (after a selection step), to counteract the Matthew Effect.
@katejjeffery My experience in selection committees, which I think matches most people's, is that the very top and the very bottom candidates are clear. But when you start scoring decimal points around the cutoff, it becomes incredibly subjective.
@cyrilpedia I do too, for applications around the funding boundary. Going into a lottery would therefore be something you could put on a cv even if you didn't get funded