@bert_hubert no, its still shit ex 10c "under their responsibility." Well, I wrote the MR under a CLA that warrants it's suitability and includes test cases. Seems I'd be responsible, no?
@bert_hubert @revk @neil sure it is if individuals who can't afford a law suit from $corp (meritied or not, malicious or not) are exposed while their own employees are shielded behind lawyers with infinite pockets
@bert_hubert @revk @neil unless effectively baning individual contributions, with or with out CLA, is acceptable?
@falken @bert_hubert @revk @neil the actual CRA reports that just contributing doesn't make you liable... If there's a CLA, it depends on what it entails, but I would expect CLAs to be rewritten with the CRA I'm mind now.
@alessandrolai @bert_hubert @revk @neil thanks for the insight
@falken @revk @neil if you sign pieces of paper saying you are responsible, you might perhaps end up being responsible? This does not seem to be a CRA problem.