@Locksmith @arh

I’m gonna use it till I see a change in real world, so not gonna stop anytime soon.

The #USA has made plenty of change over the past several decades. What are other changes you would like to see occur?

@Locksmith @realcaseyrollins @arh

>mandatory machine gun in every home.

Liberals> 👮‍♂️🤚 You have to buy health insurance because if you ended up in the emergency room it would cost taxpayers lots of money, otherwise 1,200 fine! 💁‍♀️💰

Why not?>👮‍♂️🤚 If you don't have home defense you might get home invaded and have to call the police which would cost taxpayers, so get a machine gun or 1,200 fine please 💁‍♀️💰

🤷‍♀️ seems equivalent logic to me.
Follow

@anonymoose

While I agree with your defence of firearm ownership in general this logic seems flawed to me. If you have a gun and manage to defend your own home you still need to call the police and they still need to go through all the steps they normally would. In fact, it probably takes them more man hours to handle a case where a civilian shot an intruder than a case where a cop did (since there are more unknowns for them to investigate.

So owning a gun for home defense doesnt actually save tax payers as you would suggest.

Now with that said the healthcare argument is also weak. Having insurance doesnt in any way reduce costs nor does it effect the out of pocket money of tax payers.. the point of insurance is that instead of paying a 10K bill in one shot you pre-pay by paying smaller bills (insurance) over the course of years which by the time you need 10K in medical bills the amount you put into insurance has exceeded the amount you had to pay. So all it really does is amortize the cost, it doesnt reduce them, in fact it increases overall cost.

@arh@toots.alirezahayati.com @realcaseyrollins @Locksmith

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.