@ohellno
Just the very existence of immune system disproves entire germ theory.
This whole bit of unintelligent dribble can be disproven in all of 2 seconds.. take a pH strip touch it to a chicken pox sore quickly, and see if it shows an extremely low pH, which of course, it will not.
People love to make up whatever bullshit sounds right to them and fits the world they want to make up in their head and really have no intention of taking even a moment to verify it, if they did they might find out they were wrong and their ego can't handle that.
I am not the one making outlandish claims, so I have no need to test their absurd theory... They indicated a theory without absolutely no evidence to back it up, evidence that would be trivial to gather. The lack of evidence and effort means the theory is not based on observed evidence but pulled out of their ass. That pattern alone is more than enough for me to discount it.
Now if they actually bothered to do **science** and test their assertions and presented that as part of their claim, then it would be less outlandish and would be a legitimate reason to expect scientists to repeat the test and see if the theory of acidic secretions has any basis in reality.
Its like me saying "Oh by the way unicorns are real, I can prove it because a bunch of poop you find in the woods has rainbows shooting out of it!"... and the nthem demanding scientist show we have done extensive studies disproving poop with rainbows coming out of it.. Its not mine or any other scientists wackadoo theory, so its not my obligation or that of other scientists to put any effort into it.
You can beleive whatever you want, but you are wrong and you look like an idiot for thinking otherwise.. Of course you think you are right, so feel free to do a study and get it peer reviewed. You will fail (Because your ideas are bullshit) but if you happen to gather any actual evidence then youll prove me wrong.
As for all the "evidence" disproving germ theory.. I've spent a lot of time int he past reading through many people who have came and claimed that and debated it.. all of it was complete idiotic nonsense, and not one bit of it held up to existing knowledge or understanding.
The hundreds of thousands of scientists working with viruses every day already prove its legitimate, most of what they do wouldnt work or make any sense if viruses werent real
> "They can't all be wrong"
No I'm not. I'm basing it on the fact that I have seen and understand what they do in the lab, how they verify things, the scrutiny that goes on, and seeing with my own eyes and repeating some experiments on my own to know that what they say works, works. things that would never and could never work if viruses werent real.
> There are plenty of references and resources available on my site. So if you want to believe in viruses rather than dig in and find answers then do be it.
As I already said, I've already dug in plenty of resources, and they are all written by morons who dont know the first thing about logic or how to "prove" even the most basic things. I have no expectation that your claims are anything new that I havent already seen. However if you wish to bring your evidence into this conversation, go for it. I've done enough digging to know its idiocy, but if you happen to be the one person arguing this shit who has some real evidence, feel free to try to bring it.
> I would rather base what i know to be true from evidence, so enjoy your day.
Clearly not, there is a mountain of evidence and you seem to be pretending like it doesnt even exist, meanwhile you have presented none for your outlandish bullshit.
Good day, I certainly have no time for shoveling your bullshit
And has that experiment been proven or debunked? quoting an observation from 100 years ago doesnt get you very far unless you can show that int he 100 years since experiments have consistently proven it to be true... you do realize 1919 medicine without any reflection on the 100 years of evidence after that is not proving anything right? What do the other 100 years of experiments say?
When did I say I didnt?
More importantly though, I'm not the one trying to make a convincing case, you are. Do you really expect people to go off and invest time in researching an outlandish claim that relies on the entire world of scientists being in on some perpetual conspiracy theory for 100 years without strong evidence to back that up?
Your evidence is one random guy from 100 years ago who claimed to observe something, before they even had the tools to make good tests in the first place. No one is going to go research your flat-earth level bullshit off of one random dude 100 years ago saying he saw something as your "evidence"
@freemo @ohellno
What an idiot, they admitted fraud lies thousands times before you stupid fuck they lie again you idiot. The report I linked above, which you didn't bother to look because you are upfuck egoistic narcisist who can't handle being wrong, proves what I say since january 2020 100%.
Everything govt said was a lie and you went with every single one. there are thousands others they admitted conspiracy as well.
I told you you will cry.
Soon.
@phicyclist @freemo @ohellno I can't stand liars and repeating lies. You are absolutely right, sometimes I forget I am not dealing with rational humans but blind sheep.
I treat people how they deserve to be treated.. he acted with more than enough disrespect to be treated in like kind. If he doesnt want to be treated with animosity the first step is he apologizes, otherwise i will.
@freemo @akeno @ohellno
Everyone is at a different point in their lives. Would you hold a child throwing a tantrum to the same standard as an adult having a bad day? Do you know what a person's experiences & perspectives are, or that they won't have different understanding at some point? Disengaging is often wise.
An eye for an eye and the whole world goes blind. If we are not patient & forgiving with each other eventually the only thing that's left is hate, and that destroys all involved.
> Would you hold a child throwing a tantrum to the same standard as an adult having a bad day?
Yes I would, I would expect them to apologize and until they did they would remain punished.
I dont really give a damn about forces of darkness or whatever else. I have no issue treating people with the respect they earn. It gives them the power to determine how they are treated and ensures that those who act respecfully are rewarded for that.
When respect stops to be something earned then it stops having value.
> With forgiveness, compassion and unconditional love we increase the radiance of Love and Light of the One Infinite Creator in our vicinity.
The creator commited mass murder and filled off an entire planet of humans because of the way they were behaving, if anything I am following his example.
@freemo @Andrii @akeno @ohellno
The reasons for the cleansing were the same as for the instruction to wipe out the Canaanites: cannibalism, human sacrifice & numerous other destructive practices.
God did not do this simply because they were rude & obnoxious. Rather, He commands compassion, forgiveness & patience.
"Forgive them, for they don't know what they're doing."
Are you seriously going to sit there and dictate what god is, and the "history" around him as if you are preaching some fact with 0 humility... christ man i have no problem with your beleifs but you really have to cut the whole enlightened act because you are farther from it than most.
Feel free to share your religious opinion by all means I have no issue with that but when you dont preface these statements with things like "I believe" or "In my opinion" and instead recite them as if your some all-knowing being who is the one and only person holding some unquestionable truth, and all other interpretations are null and void that tells me right off the bat you haven't taken even the first step towards a spiritually enlightened state and care more about stroking your ego and feeling important.
Humility is the first step, consider no longer play acting the part and maybe heading down the path...
Nothing is ever certain in this density. And you have full ability to make up your own mind about anything that you will. Generally I do not operate in a personified frame of reference so what "I believe" is of little or no interest. Here is one of the quotes which Illustrates the point I was conveying.
"The entity which succeeded the first Yahweh, calling itself by the same name and using the same frequency of light to express, simply continued to offer aid and comfort when it wished but with the ever increasing distortions towards belligerency and aggressiveness that is the hallmark of a negatively oriented being or culture. The echoes of this action, which was transmitted long ago, redounds even now and shall continue to echo and re-echo as long as there are those within third density, within this sphere, who wish to claim power and who seek a god of power.
Now let us look at the promise first made and the promise that took its place. The hunger which many among your peoples have had revolves around knowing what is right. It is instinctive within your physical vehicle to watch out for the safety and the comfort of the body, the mind, and the spirit. The continual proclamations and greatly detailed taboos, prohibitions, and schedules of sacrifice that characterized the relationship of your so-called Old Testament God constituted an order, a structure, a logic within which entities felt comfortable living. Through this structure they knew what was right. The tendency was to enunciate finer and finer point of law until all possible actions with ethical consequences or consequences of safety and health were covered and the entities within this system were safe.
We ask you to look about you within your present world scene and see the entities about you looking for a way to be safe. Look upon your leaders who wish to prohibit freedom in order to guarantee safety. The spirit of Yahweh is strong and it survives. It is part of that mixture of light and dark which makes up all that is. In other words, we are saying that entities continue to have a choice between the many laws of moral rectitude in such a logic as Yahweh’s. They can also choose a logic and a path which is not rational or linear, which does not hold, which does not insist, and which is not aggressive. This spirit was before the one known as Jesus the Christ. It exists, as does Yahweh, within each entity, for each of you is the universe. You are looking out at a world that is actually interior. Such is the illusion created by flesh.
In the testament of the one known as Jesus, the place of the law is simply turned upon its head as the one known as Jesus is quoted as saying, "Man was not made for the Sabbath, but the Sabbath for man." The direction to love the one infinite Creator and to love each other-self as the self is not a detailed, closed, or encapsulated direction. It is specifically open-ended, and the one known as Jesus goes to some pains in the body of teaching that survives to impress upon those whom He taught that there is never an end to love. There is never the need to return to the old prescriptions and old taboos. These are not either/or situations but rather either/or processes, and as each student works upon its personal polarity, perhaps it will aid the student to ponder and remember these two kinds of promises, these two kinds of ways of thinking. And perhaps this can be instructive in showing the way, the balance, when that way seems unclear.
We wish to tell you that your model of the universe is very, very limited. The attempt to nail down a history which is replete with metaphysical subject matter shall always be unending and full of lacunae, holes, gaps and spaces where there is no logic, there are no words, there is no road, there is no structure. Not that there is no structure, just that there is, beyond all structure, love. The illusion is so very, very deep. For you are a dream, yet when you leave the flesh and enter a larger life you will still be a dream, for we also are but illusions and ahead we see illusion. Yet always that siren call which beckons you and beckons us calls us all forward. And yet are we forward-going? We do not think so. We feel at this point the comfortable awareness that we do not know what is occurring. We only know how to be faithful to love. When it is accepted within the heart that nothing can be known and that a sea of confusion will always surround love, then the mind and the heart are better armed to take up the walk of the pilgrim who seeks truth, peace, and love.
That call has come to many who wander within this world of yours at this time, listening for a sound, a tone, a letter from home, waiting, hardly hoping at some times, yet holding onto the faith that that which is within, that which is so hungrily sought, does exist. And we say to you, "Yes, love exists. Love is before, after, and around all that is." You do not seek an ephemerous. You seek that which is and that which exists perfectly. We encourage all lines of thinking which fascinate your minds, and we hope that we can, within your meditative periods, be with you as strengtheners of your own vibration. But we do continue to remark that the ways of seeking which are scholarly arid of the mind yield a limited harvest. This is acceptable to us. 'e can look at what is possible within your world and see that it will be helpful and useful. And we encourage those who are drawn to this material, to this subject, to continue that process of thinking, meditating, and reflecting, for these are helpful things not simply to the self, but in terms of service to others as well.
Let those truths that you seek remain small enough for you to remember that beyond all that can be understood or discussed is the truth, and that is a vibration which has created all that is and into which we hunger and yearn to move again. That should keep your intelligence and your heart on a sturdy road that has good perspective.
We would at this time transfer this contact to the one known as Jim. We do thank this instrument and leave it in love and in light. We are those known to you as Q'uo."
Q'uo, Confederation of Planets,
LLResearch 1996/01/21