@average_random_joe

The credentials of the peer review board are hardly relevant.. the point is if you can demonstrate you did the experiment and it didnt replicate, or can otherwise show why the experiment is faulted, the paper gets rejected. The peer review process is also accessible for anyone to see so if the peer review board does not faithfully act by rejecting papers that have been debunked they wont be **democratically** elected next run around and there is a record of their behavior regardless.

Moreover because the review board is elected and open to a vote it is not their credentials that are the authority, they have simply proved their abilities in the past to conduct the peer review process fairly.

@ohellno @MrMaxPowers247