福神龍
@freemo @icedquinn @madmike @Coyote Shit in Shit out. NY Data is all corrupt. Assuming it isn't because they are "doctors" is fallacious - they aren't, they are administrators who make tens of millions of dollars for their organization keeping people in the hospital, not treating and discharging them.
Find a study, that supports the use of it. If you can argue the opposite side of a single study.
Find a study, that supports the use of it. If you can argue the opposite side of a single study.
Follow
🇳🇱
It is hardly the only study, there are plenty of studies that all find similar results with different variations in the cocktail or the parameters of the study
This topic has been done to death.. its quite obvious it is **not** a treatment for COVID suitable to the general public. At best it may be a last resort effort for extremely high risk people who contract COVID, and even that is a maybe.
Not remotely true, but think what you wish, I have no desire to argue with you.
@freemo @icedquinn @madmike @Coyote
I wouldn't want to argue your position either. It's clearly one born of political misalignment than scientific scholarship and truth.
I wouldn't want to argue your position either. It's clearly one born of political misalignment than scientific scholarship and truth.
Not mocking you, simply dont care and have no interesting in arguing with a brick wall.
@anon00110 i can't speak to exact volumes but i can at least point to the very large study that turned out to have been a corporate shit-op, passed peer review, cited by press and then retracted because it turned out to have never actually been conducted: https://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(20)31180-6.pdf
@freemo @Coyote @madmike
@freemo @Coyote @madmike
Incorrect. There are not "plenty of studies" and the ones that may be available are from incredibly biased sources or behind paywalls.
You're wrong on this. Anecdotal evidence of treatments is evidence. Peer-reviewed studies for medical treatment take several years to produce, hence the FDA process. The academic or data based studies either 1) used only Hydroxychloroquine and not in combination, or 2) used corrupted data from bad faith parties.