https://twitter.com/MaggieEThornton/status/1380652509405003776
@Coyote you’re doing good work🤣 I’d join you but I’m permanently suspended from Twitter. Every time I open the app there is this big banner that says “Welcome Back” but I can’t tweet and they zero’d out my followers and followed accounts.
It's just confronting fools with their own stupidity. When both had "PhD" next to their names, and can't support a single scientific claim, it mostly says our educational system is garbage. But we all knew that... 😂
🇳🇱
@madmike @freemo @Coyote Yes you are right #hcqworks don't listen to scummo he is corrupt academic morally defunct, with god complex, works for government pathological liar as caught many times, just a human garbage that will pay at the end of scamdemic. Covid19 doesn't exist. Virus doesn't exist.
And if scummo says otherwise he can collect free money here https://samueleckert.net/isolat-truth-fund/ he won't because he is simply a liar.
I know it exists, I've had it, still not breathing right. Got it last March, wish I would have got it now, when they know a bit more.
What's real though is, it's a rather small blip, flu sized so far, and I suspect more life-long damage than a typical flu. But still, it's no where near the scale they say it is, and until I see this data from our own country, I'm going to believe this scale is probably a reasonable representation:
https://twitter.com/VoidSurf1/status/1320269542174720000
Hey @Coyote I'm not at all claiming you didn't catch something. The problem is the boys with SEM have gone into blood sample after blood sample of "Covid" patients, and keep coming back with influenza etc.
So I'm still looking for the lab w. an SEM who captured the thing. Seems like a cool achievement, so why is it so hard for me to find that lab with their image?
Either way here is one study (and there are countless others like it) that identify the virus and produce quite a few SEM images of it while they interact with various cells.
You asked for SEM images of the virus, thats it.. it shows it while interacting with the cell. What are you asking for, a SEM of the virus in isolation while not acting on the cell. Not sure why it matters if the cell is present or not, but sure, there are SEM images of the virus by itself too.I attached a closeup of one.
If you want a full study that goes into the structure along with SEM images here is that for you:
Yes, I really appreciated that I could access/download both of those! 👍
@vandys In the Pdf the virus in the image obviously originated in someones blood. Granted it was later replicated in vitro but it still started in someones blood. So how can it be anything other than that?
You will never find the case where they just take some blood from someone put it in a SEM and bam, see a virus, any virus. There has to be an in vitro step to replicate the virus so they are numerous enough to be spotted, otherwise its like searching for a needle in a haystack.
@freemo
Oh, so the other aspect was source. I was wondering about the "chain of evidence" scenario, where someone presents, is diagnosed, then blood draw and *then* pick out the virus from their blood stream. This is the scenario where I read there was some frustration with labs only finding influenza instead of SARS-Cov-2.
You've done enough for me, so not asking for any more help. But that's the scenario tagged with a question mark in my mind.
Thanks for being on the Fediverse.