@icedquinn It wasnt about the gramatical structure, it was about the incorrect facts it inferred (which were still incorrect once you corrected your wording).
@icedquinn Either way, your statement was incorrect.. there is no meaningful link between SAr-COV-2 and the common cold
You might be able to find some studies out there that would estimate closer to 30%, there is certainly some variability in the numbers.. But no, 15% is the most commonly cited figure.
Here are two different sources bot of which confirm the 15% figure I cited:
Pelczar MJ, Chan EC, Noel RK (2010). Microbiology: Application Based Approach. p. 656. ISBN 978-0-07-015147-5. Archived from the original on 16 May 2016.
La Fayette Cecil R, Goldman L, Schafer AI (2012). Goldman's Cecil Medicine, Expert Consult Premium Edition (24 ed.). Elsevier Health Sciences. p. 2103. ISBN 978-1-4377-1604-7. Archived from the original on 4 May 2016.
Like i said, the value is an approximate so you will see higher and lower numbers, so I dont doubt youll find some 30% figures. But even as you point out, thats on the fringe high end of estimates.
And yea your perfectly find in saying that coronavirus class viruses (unrelated to THE coronavirus however) causes a minority of cold cases. Though as I pointed out the Rhinovirus class is the most common cause of colds at 30% - 80%.