If this thing was so safe and so effective against something soo deadly ... then why would anyone need to be persuaded into taking it?
🇳🇱
Probably because some people are conspiracy theorists, so while it is safe they might be under the false impression it isnt...
That said, while all the data shows its safer to take the vaccine than not, I do think its prudent to wait just to make sure. So I wouldnt say someone is a conspiracy theorist if they are just a little cautious either.
@freemo@qoto.org @djsumdog@djsumdog.com @se7en@freespeechextremist.com When you say "all the data shows" I hear "I'm a midwit who listens to the mkultra sex kittens on NPR and believe I'm experiencing thoughts". The vaxx is a bio-weapon designed in Wuhan, funded by Jews.
Sorry, yes I must be a nitwit for not thinking it is a bio-weapon designed by an elite group of underground jewish scientists... how stupid of me.
@freemo@qoto.org @djsumdog@djsumdog.com @se7en@freespeechextremist.com midwit. It means your in the range where you think you're smarter than you actually are. You've never looked at any data yet you say "all the data" because that's what you've heard people say who were passing as experts.
I'm literally a Data Scientist.. not only have I reviewed the data, I'm paid a hell of a lot of money to spend a lot of time looking at this data... So yea looking like you're the idiot here buddy.
@freemo@qoto.org @djsumdog@djsumdog.com @se7en@freespeechextremist.com then you know that in the past 28 days more vaccinated people have died of the delta variant in England than non-vaccinated.
Putting aside if that is true or not, im not sure you even realize what that would say if it were true. The statement alone, true or false, means nothing without doing what we call "normalization". I can explain what that means and why such a statement is meaningless, but im not entierly sure you care to listen honestly.
If a statement you make is meaningless (in this case because it is unnormalized) then likewise the conclusion you infer off of that statement is equally meaningless... So we are back at the fundamental point that you dont understand WHY your initial statement, even if true, is meaningless, nor what you would need to do with that data to make it meaningful.
Again more than happy to teach you about statistics and show you all that, but I suspect it might be a waste of my time. You clearly already came to your conclusions.
@freemo@qoto.org @djsumdog@djsumdog.com @se7en@freespeechextremist.com I already have my hypothesis which is based on my understanding of geopolitics and the treachery of Jews and satanists against God's children. The data need only not contradict that. Even if 80% of Brits over 50 are vaccinated, it still means that a significant number of their deaths are being attributed to the delta. My thought is not that the vaxx is not effective, but that it is effective at killing.
@djsumdog@djsumdog.com @se7en@freespeechextremist.com well they've basically admitted that the "virus" escaped from the Wuhan lab. The only interesting thing about this virus is the "spike protein" that causes inflammation in different organs. How did they isolate it so quickly, and design an mRNA sequence to generate it? Seems like the pharma companies (all run by Jews) funded the research then created these jabs to kill as many Goy as they could.
@freemo@qoto.org @djsumdog@djsumdog.com @se7en@freespeechextremist.com sure, but what it suggests to me is that the vaccine IS the "delta" variant. They are killing people by injecting them with this toxic spike protein producing mRNA and calling it a variant.