@Eris @freemo @djsumdog @natsock whatever the science community has gotten bored debating, tbh.

@icedquinn @djsumdog @freemo @natsock

Alexa pull up the article on Hitler.
"This evil monster raped and pillaged europe for decades and everyone agrees he was evil there is no debate on this!"

Truly an unbiased site with nothing but settled facts.

@icedquinn @Eris @djsumdog @freemo @natsock this is when they get caught in some scientific fraud and turn to gaslighting

@Eris

It is things like "the earth is round"... something that has such an overwhelming amount of evidence proving it to be the case that you can pretty much not bother to put any energy into the topic unless someone has extraordinary evidence.

@djsumdog @natsock

@freemo @djsumdog @natsock Sounds like a bunch of bullshit.

@Eris

Only if your into nonsense conspiracy theories or something. Which is fine if thats your thing, just dont bother the rest of us humans with it.

@djsumdog @natsock

@freemo @djsumdog @natsock "conspiracy theories" lmfao

@freemo
Can someone be a dissident to a scientific institution without being as divergent as a flat-earther?

@Eris @djsumdog

@natsock

Every idea that the scientific community adopts started out a fringe idea. Happens all the time.

@djsumdog @Eris

@freemo @natsock @djsumdog That's not how it works at all lmao. Scientists just setup experiments to confirm their preconceived notions.

@freemo
Perhaps a generation ago that was still true, but now it is an institution whose perceived authority is leveraged to bolster liberal narratives, and everything which cannot serve that purpose is ostracized. Because knowledge generation has always been such a gatekept process, it's apparently been pretty easy to recast the priestly class.

Obviously, some fields are less politically useful than others and are relatively untouched by this, but honestly just give it time.

@djsumdog @Eris

@freemo @natsock @djsumdog @Eris

It's a settled fact that niggers have a lower IQ on average than Whites by a full standard deviation. Do you accept this settled fact, or are you a Creationist who denies evolution?

@DK_Dharmaraj @freemo @djsumdog @natsock The phrase "settled fact" is antithetical to actual science.

@DK_Dharmaraj
This is a great example of gatekeeping. Anything that directly butts heads with the political motives of the community will be discarded as "bad science" and there no process through that.

@freemo @Eris @djsumdog

@natsock

Do you have an example of after him being labeled a racist journals refusing to take his publicans or peer-review submissions?

@djsumdog @Eris @DK_Dharmaraj

@freemo @natsock @djsumdog @Eris @DK_Dharmaraj His wikipedia article references a number of articles saying as much. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Watson#Comments_on_race

@freemo @natsock @djsumdog @DK_Dharmaraj bruh

@freemo
Let's stop with that. The AAPA is not going to all smack their foreheads and concede to racism. Their constituents are not interested in research that contravenes their values, which they are allowed to keep because they are entirely in tune with the political zeitgeist.

https://physanth.org/about/position-statements/aapa-statement-race-and-racism-2019/

@djsumdog @Eris @DK_Dharmaraj

@natsock

So no then, thanks.

@djsumdog @Eris @DK_Dharmaraj

@freemo @natsock @djsumdog @Eris

Why are you a Creationist? Why do you deny evolution?

@freemo @natsock @djsumdog @DK_Dharmaraj You are an ideologue who cannot be reasoned with.

@Eris

ditto

@djsumdog @natsock @DK_Dharmaraj

@freemo @Eris @djsumdog @natsock

Why do you not accept the robustly established scientific consensus that niggers are dumb?

@freemo @djsumdog @natsock @DK_Dharmaraj No lmao. It's just you.

@Eris

I have no doubt you think that.

@djsumdog @natsock @DK_Dharmaraj

@freemo @Eris @djsumdog @natsock

Says the evolution denialist

@freemo
CNN: "James Watson re-endowed with honors after new study revealing niggers are subhuman"

@djsumdog @Eris @DK_Dharmaraj

@DK_Dharmaraj @freemo @Eris @djsumdog @natsock its a settled fact that IQ is not construct valid. do you accept this settled fact, or are you an ideologue?

seanamcclure.medium.com/intelligence-complexity-and-the-failed-science-of-iq-4fb17ce3f12

@racerealist @DK_Dharmaraj @djsumdog @freemo @natsock

Sir you cited an opinion piece from medium you are embarrassing yourself.

@Eris @DK_Dharmaraj @djsumdog @freemo @natsock you are dismissing an article before having read it. dont be a dumb faggot and learn to read

@racerealist @DK_Dharmaraj @djsumdog @freemo @natsock
>you are dismissing an article before having read it
Yeah, absolutely.

@Eris @DK_Dharmaraj @djsumdog @freemo @natsock yeah that makes you a dumb illiterate fag

tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10888691.2014.983635

@racerealist @DK_Dharmaraj @djsumdog @freemo @natsock
No it doesn't lol.

@Eris @DK_Dharmaraj @djsumdog @freemo @natsock yes it does. read Richardson and Norgate's arguments and get back to me.

@racerealist @DK_Dharmaraj @djsumdog @freemo @natsock I neither know nor care who those people are or what their arguments are.

@racerealist @Eris @djsumdog @freemo @natsock

This is the psychometric equivalent of epicycles posited to save geocentrism. You're a midwit faggot

@DK_Dharmaraj @Eris @djsumdog @freemo @natsock why do you not respond to Sean's arguments?

@racerealist @DK_Dharmaraj @djsumdog @freemo @natsock What arguments?

@Eris @DK_Dharmaraj @djsumdog @freemo @natsock read here fag tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10888691.2014.983635

@racerealist @DK_Dharmaraj @djsumdog @freemo @natsock i aint clickin dat shit nigga if you've got an argument make it here yourself like a man

@Eris @DK_Dharmaraj @djsumdog @freemo @natsock IQ is not a construct valid test. i had already argued that. that should be obvious. it has numerous conceptual and methodological problems (there is no theory for IQ test construction nor any theory for why individuals differ in intelligence)

for this reason, psychologists have historically tried to reify IQ thru correlational studies. they believe this provides it predictive validity. for starters theres an issue here as correlations arent the same as predicting unforeseen observations (IQ cannot do that as it has no explanatory theories) but mostly the correlations are either self-fulfilling (no shit it correlates with school achievement, the SAT and IQ are different versions of the same test) or the correlations are very low such as in the IQ/job performance relationship (see richardson and norgate)

@racerealist @Eris @djsumdog @freemo @natsock

If your theory were correct then literal retards would have the exact same intelligence as physiologically normal human beings. The fact that they don't is all the refutation this bullshit needs. In reality it's just special pleading and semantic hair splitting over the fact that, being a mental quality, it's inherently trickier to measure intelligence than it is a physical quality like height

@racerealist @Eris @DK_Dharmaraj @djsumdog @freemo @natsock >correlation

"Do you have a source on that?

Source?

A source. I need a source.

Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.

No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.

You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.

Do you have a degree in that field?

A college degree? In that field?

Then your arguments are invalid.

No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.

Correlation does not equal causation.

CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.

You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.

Nope, still haven't.

I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a chud."

@racerealist @Eris @djsumdog @freemo @natsock

Because they're retarded. "Socio-economic status" isn't "construct valid" either but you retarded niggers use it all the time. "Alexa, what is a heuristic?"

@DK_Dharmaraj @racerealist @djsumdog @freemo @natsock
>testing someone's reasoning skills doesnt actually show you their reasoning skills
am i supposed to actually take this argument seriously

@Eris @DK_Dharmaraj @djsumdog @freemo @natsock where did i make this argument?

@racerealist @DK_Dharmaraj @djsumdog @freemo @natsock That is my non-nerd translation of your argument.

@DK_Dharmaraj @Eris @djsumdog @freemo @natsock when did i or Sean mention SES?

why do you not respond to Sean's arguments?

@racerealist @DK_Dharmaraj @djsumdog @freemo @natsock
>why do you not respond to Sean's arguments?
Because he's not here to make them. Make your own.

@racerealist @Eris @djsumdog @freemo @natsock

Now I get it, you're literally too retarded to understand analogies

@DK_Dharmaraj @Eris @djsumdog @freemo @natsock see : poa.st/notice/AACYzrYOPcRONoW6wS

also learn to read

@racerealist @Eris @djsumdog @freemo @natsock

Does "Socio-economic status" have predictive validity? Yes or no

@racerealist @DK_Dharmaraj @Eris @djsumdog @freemo @natsock I got your argument right here.

@AnimeTradCath @DK_Dharmaraj @Eris @djsumdog @freemo @natsock yeah for sure