@Salaru

We call this cherry-picked data. Do the same chart but now look at COVID **deaths**. Texas has had a 40x increase in deaths over that time. Hawaii has had only about a 4x increase in the same time period.

Its almost like the vaccines are keeping people from dying or getting the disease as strongly... funny that, its doing what its supposed to.

@freemo Check the "Covid short" notepad for a shit ton of links on vaxxing deaths. Most recent at the bottom.
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/xqxptfdi2ljzz/Documents

@Salaru I'm well aware of the anti-vax propaganda when it comes to making up vaccine deaths. I've been through this discussion countless times.

@freemo So you're also ignoring that gates was saying depopulation would require forced vaccination in 2010? It was even in the papers. Not to mention the MRNA inventor came out against it himself. Or that the left is nuts about planned parenthood because gates father, the eugenicist, and sangers started planned parenthood as "Project Negro" to control black population. Or the last century or so of the forced sterilization of indigenous women, who the media ignores the recent disappearances of?

@Salaru @freemo hawaii is 56% vaccinated, new york is 65%. new york has more deaths than texas

@icedquinn

How is that relevant. The numbers I used were normalized per population (relative change), you are not normalizing per population and using absolute numbers, ergo not valid. You cant just argue against good statistics with bad ones and think that makes a point of some kind.

@Salaru

@freemo @icedquinn I'm saying that you're trusting the statistice from the same people who insisted that aids was made not by an experimental vax, but by gay people fucking monkeys. And that flip flopping fraud fauci supressed useful treatments and spread disinformation then too, while the WHO went to declassify homosexuality as a "disease" in africa. All less than a decade after the CDC was performing illegal experiments on black people. It's the party of eugenics. They control "statistics".

@Salaru

I am not trusting the statistics from any one "people" im trusting the statistics from many independent sources that all agree rather closely with each other. I would never rely on a single source by itself unless I verified indepdendent sources confirmed the data, and they have.

@icedquinn

@Salaru

For that matter if the data is so untrustworthy then why did **you** use that same data in your original post as if it was meaningful when you thought it agreed with you? Now all of a sudden the same data you used actually shows your wrong its bad data.

See the problem there? Again we call that cherry picking.

@icedquinn