If every company has "a responsibility" to do "the most profitable thing possible" then what's going to stop everyone from offering to sell people smack... on credit? Or whatever they can think of that comes closest to that?
🇳🇱
@futurebird Because that wouldnt be the most profitable thing possible. In fact that would be probably one of the least profitable choices a company could make.
One would hope. AND YET
@futurebird As far as I know there are no companies that sell smack....
@freemo Purdue Pharma.
That is not an example of a company that has sold cocaine.
Also we discussed them in another part of a thread briefly.
> You know that smack refers to heroin, not cocaine, right
Thanks, actually i was mistaken, I was thinking of smack as cocain (though now that you mention it I did know it was in reference to heroin).
> and that oxycontin is essentially time released heroin?
No Oxycontin is the time-released formulation of Oxycodon not Heroin. While they are opioids they are chemically different chemicals. In fact as far as opioids go there are more structurally similar examples.
> That is what I was replying to. They sold smack.
Ahh ok, this makes sense now. Thanks for clarifying.
@freemo You know that smack refers to heroin, not cocaine, right, and that oxycontin is essentially time released heroin? That is what I was replying to. They sold smack.