@danny

I tend to agree. We could argue the same, if the accuser isnt made public then how can people with evidence related to the crime, about the accuser, ever come to light either.

The transparency absolutely should go both ways.

I'd argue that hiding their identities makes sense if there is a special circumstance where they would be at particular risk... but that should be the exception and should that be the case I'd agree the entire case should be sealed including the name of the accused.

Also, making the accuser anonymous, not sure how that would even work from a practical standpoint.

@bonifartius