I could never image the prices so to up like this but..
..what more amazes me is all the stupid crypto scams that have been going since
It's almost like common sense is just thrown out the door and people start believing in magic
Just because it's happening on the internet with a fancy new technique doesn't mean you can endlessly print money from thin air, it has to come from somewhere
@stux I made a **lot** of money on crypto.. I invested in ethereum the first day it was released.
Never touched BTC though that one is kinda pointless IMO
@freemo Sure but it has to come from somewhere 😉
@stux That is a fallacy of economics.. wealth is not a fixed quantity, things that provide utility cause wealth to be created (and can also be destroyed)... so no the money doesnt have to "come from somewhere".
@stux Thats like arguing against encryption because bad people can use it to hide what they do. and some people might use that hide bad things.
Its hard for me to see why you think encryption should be allowed, when it can and is used to hide people doing bad things, but privacy and self-control over my money shouldnt be allowed for the same reasons?
@freemo No, that's not close
Encryption is used so widely for so many things so prob 99% of it's usage is for good
and encyption doesn't cause millions damage each day over and over
there should be regulation for big corps like FTX and other exchanges or busineses that evolve around crypto, not the avergage person..
how can you be against setting up a system that prevents massive theft?
> Encryption is used so widely for so many things so prob 99% of it's usage is for good
Ok so your saying we should adopt crypto currency and have it replace 99% of money cause then you can say its used for 99% of things and therefore mostly used for good?
Hey its your logic man im just rolling with it :)
> and encyption doesn't cause millions damage each day over and over
Sure it does... everytime someone does something illegal that costs millions in damage, anything, if they didnt have encryption then they wouldnt have been able to do it because everything they say or do can be listened in on... you cant cause millions in damage if you arent allowed to have any secrets...
You think those huge companies that cause tens of millions in **intentional** damage to society would be able to get away with it if they didnt have encryption?
Wait regulation only should apply to big companies? No, it should apply to everyone.
I never said I was against regulation. I said I was against your view of cryptocurrency as a bad thing, in particular that having privacy around my money is bad... regulate all you want, but do so without infringing on my right to privacy.
> how can you be against setting up a system that prevents massive theft?
I am not, so long as you dont try to take away my freedom of privacy to do it... and so long as you dont prevent me from deciding myself how I want to trade with other people.
The problem is cash has rules.. try to take out large chunks or deposit large chunks and any reputable bank must report you. I think thats the crux of the problem.. not the forensics.. just the fact that governments cant control the flow of money anymore at all.
@freemo @stux the rules only apply when interacting with licensed banks, and vary from country to country
So buying a new car with cash at a major brand dealer in the US would be a problem if you can't back up the source, but there's lots of opportunites for money to flow that don't involve banks at all, and those can't be traced unless someone reports them
Unlike cryptocurrency where every transaction is logged in a permanent record, and all an investigator needs to do is follow the records
Sure lots of ways you can spend money illicitly... But int he USA the rule is above a certain amount then the transaction must be recorded.
@freemo @stux which only matters when dealing with a law abiding business.
That's why the early 20th Century mobsters were mainly caught on tax evasion rather than most of their other crimes
Because even cash is somewhat traceable if you can get people to testify to transactions
But with cryptocurrency evey transaction is recorded, which makes the flow of money observable and greatly reduces the number of people you need to flip for a successful investigation
Indeed.. the problem is a law abiding business int he usa,a s far as i know, wouldnt need to report crypto transactions in the same way largely because it would be impossible to know if you have one big buyer vs lots of small buyers due to the anonymity.
@freemo
no, in this case it's not a feature but a bug in the "system"
It's not right people can get away with scamming millions upon millions
Why are people like Jake Paul not in jail? They are pretty known for all the shit they do