I thought qoto was supposed to be against dogma, quite disappointing
>has rule against ageism
>suspends a server with an ageist justification
So close to greatness...
🇳🇱
I can not see the message you are responding to. Happy to answer though if i know the question.
@HinamizawaShokogun22@childlove.su
Huh, speech had nothing to do with why they were spuspended, so what does our rules against hate speech against people based on age have to do with anything. Sounds like your reaching to make an argument that doesn't exist.
We do however explicitly have a rule that we will defederate over illegal activity, which promoting sex with minors would fall under.
@nep Sex with minors, even who consent, is illegal. Servers which promote this illegal act will be blocked. I would be happy to make a more explicit rule that covers this if you feel we arent clear enough about it.
@nep No because thats not how we are applying the rule.it is **specifically** because its statutory rape against a child, illegal, and part of an instance for maps that collectively warrant the block. How explicit the illegal activity happens to be will be contextual
