🎓 Dr. Freemo 🇳🇱 @freemo@social.cleverlibre.org

@lupyuen damn you you posted the wrong link!

@lupyuen I need tbis so so bad

@post @vixxo @feld

Why woukd that be naive? There is no penalty for them to say they were forced to change their wording against their will.

@post

No one is denying issues in research or even potential issues from corruption more generally.

@vixxo @feld

@post @vixxo @feld

Instead of the passive agvressive nonsense just start a seperate topic on it and tag me, i have always engaved with your nonsense so far.
It just has no place in this thread being a tangent and irrelevant.

@vixxo @post @feld

I think common sense will lead most to realize masks are probably useful for many but not all airbornse diseases. There are reasonable ways to reason about it where masks could even cause a greater soread of some diseases, maybe, when used by the general public and used improperly (whicb lets face it is most people).

That said i think we can all agree we just dont have good studies that can show it was effective in the case of covid, but we do t have evidence it was ineffective either.

@post @vixxo @feld

None of the articles here were oart of lancet gate. If you want to argue about it as a seperate issue feel free to make that post. But that discussion has no place in this thread.

@post @vixxo @feld

I could easily just enail the authors and ask if thats the case, and i am certwin thry woukd tell you you are wrong, again, and im also certain youd fibd some new even more convoluted way to tell yourself you are right.

@post @vixxo @feld

The ironic thibg is the actual wording of the reciew, whicb is usmnarized to "we dont have good studies to draw any solid conclusions about the effectiveness of masks" is itself an antimasker win. But by trying to manipulate the study and claiming it shows masks have 0 effectiveness is so blatantly dishonest tbat you took sometbing tbat could have been a win and instead just used it to discredit yourself.

@post @vixxo @feld

Where do you get thst from.. their original version quite clesrly states what i said. Ut people misinterprited what they said to erroneously claim they meant what you said.. so they are changing the wording to be more explicit so people like you dont try and put words in their mouth like you did.

@vixxo @post @feld

Jesus christ the confirmation bias is off the charts with you post.

@vixxo @post @feld

Thank you. Now thst post has been clearly told in direct terms by cochrwin review thst he was wrong and what i and others said about the interpritstion is accurate lets see if he admits he is wrong... i higbly doubt it.

@jerry As one of the earliest adopters of QTs, perhaps the first (QOTO had it for many years now) i can agree with all that, it is just a link with somenspecial formatting and behavior, and only marginally different from putting a post in your link.

I disagree about you last point tbat it needs diligant moderation and would say, no more so than people posting a link to a post would need...

@mc Nah the sellingyoursaelf part is easy, No more work than a resume and some expiernce.

No the key is being good in the first place :)

But yea if you cant do a good job at presenting yourself as good (even if you are)then you might have a hard time.

@mc just gotta impress people and get a portfolio to sell yourself thjen your gold.

@KitlerIs6 @AmpBenzScientist @mc Sure.

@mc

I mean I make 1.2 mil a year contracting and all my work relies heavily on my math background...

@AmpBenzScientist

@AmpBenzScientist Dude mathematicians are paid a fortune :)