Not sure why it would flop the examples. I was mostly agreeing.
This poll is giving me flashbacks to the time I tried to synthesize para-toluene sulfonic acid (p-TSA) and ruined it after days of effort by trying to use acetone to dissolve it to get it out of its flask... needless to say i wound up with something else entirely. Solvents arent too useful when they actually react with that which it solves :)
Forgiving people who have wronged you, and even going so far as to apologize for your own lesser mistakes, can be quite powerful for your own mental health I find. Now to be clear, this doesnt mean you let them get away with it or hurt you again, distance yourself as needed and dont stand for a repeat, but you can do that and still forgive.
You cant control how they act, and perhaps they had little real control, perhaps its just the illusion of control. Either way, thats not your problem, thats for them to grow from or not, to learn from their mistakes. The only thing you are responsible for is learning from **your** mistakes, and admitting them is not admitting a greater guilt. No matter how much they may have done wrong, focus on how you responded to it, how you provoked it, how you caused wrong, worry about learning to improve your actions and let go of the rest.
@realcaseyrollins not too bad. Einstein binge today mostly.. feeling quite emotionally sensative in a good way.. might even be able to write something meaningful.
You?
@realcaseyrollins hey there.
@freemo @retiolus @zleap @Chrisleon27
I mean... Pharmaceutical drugs are meant for treating the ill- but are used for recreation. Genitalia are meant for procreation but we have porn. Lightbulbs were meant to light up rooms- but we have blacklights to add glow to dark rooms. Computers were not meant for gaming- but these days it's one of the main reasons people get one. Certain venoms are meant to kill/paralyze prey, but modern science has re-applied them for medical treatment.
Supposedly Nazis invented the microwave. If that is true- I don't think it was made with all the people that use it today in mind...
All good points. The argument that what something was "meant for" somehow dictates its moral existence is absurd to me. A tool is a tool and the creator of the tool, regardless of his intent, does not imbue it with any special quality through that intent.
“Einstein struck a more serious pose when he addressed the Caltech student body near the end of his stay. His sermon, grounded in his humanistic outlook, was on how science had not yet been harnessed to do more good than harm. During war it gave people “the means to poison and mutilate one another,” and in peacetime it “has made our lives hurried and uncertain.” Instead of being a liberating force, “it has enslaved men to machines” by making them work “long wearisome hours mostly without joy in their labor.” Concern for making life better for ordinary humans must be the chief object of science. “Never forget this when you are pondering over your diagrams and equations!”” —Albert Einstein (1879 – 1955)
At best you can say "fully automatic weapons are made almost exclusively for war". That much is true, but doesnt describe any of the guns owned by civilians.
Muskets, one of the earliest forms of guns, was predominately used for hunting. In fact all guns throughout history outside of fully-automatic guns, were used almost exclusively for hunting and sport with only a small minority used for killing or protection.
Besides, who even cares what they are "made for".. by that logic nuclear power plants are evil because nuclear power was originally made to create bombs. The logic is extremely weak.
False. Guns are made to shoot chunks of metal really fast. The vast majority of guns are used for sport and fun and will never kill a person nor intended to.
They can kill people, they are not "made to" anymore than a spoon is exclusively made for icecream to fatten you up.
I have always strongly said guns dont kill people anymore than spoons make people fat.
@freemo @lucifargundam @Chrisleon27
+1 to that, on a similar note, not sure if this my view here is right.
Even though I am no way a gun expert, i would argue guns don't kill people , people kill people with guns, either intentionally or through misuse.
Same as cars, leave the hand break off, car rolls down hill and kills someone,
I think in San Francisco it is a requirement to turn the wheels in a certain way when parking so that does not happen on hills should the breaks fail.
I have always strongly said guns dont kill people anymore than spoons make people fat.
Jeffrey Phillips Freeman
Innovator & Entrepreneur in Machine Learning, Evolutionary Computing & Big Data. Avid SCUBA diver, Open-source developer, HAM radio operator, astrophotographer, and anything nerdy.
Born and raised in Philadelphia, PA, USA, currently living in Utrecht, Netherlands, USA, and Thailand. Was also living in Israel, but left.
Pronouns: Sir / Mister
(Above pronouns are not intended to mock, i will respect any persons pronouns and only wish pronouns to show respect be used with me as well. These are called neopronouns, see an example of the word "frog" used as a neopronoun here: http://tinyurl.com/44hhej89 )
A proud member of the Penobscot Native American tribe, as well as a Mayflower passenger descendant. I sometimes post about my genealogical history.
My stance on various issues:
Education: Free to PhD, tax paid
Abortion: Protected, tax paid, limited time-frame
Welfare: Yes, no one should starve
UBI: No, use welfare
Racism: is real
Guns: Shall not be infringed
LGBT+/minorities: Support
Pronouns: Will respect
Trump: Moron, evil
Biden: Senile, racist
Police: ACAB
Drugs: Fully legal, no prescriptions needed
GPG/PGP Fingerprint: 8B23 64CD 2403 6DCB 7531 01D0 052D DA8E 0506 CBCE