🎓 Dr. Freemo 🇳🇱 @freemo@social.cleverlibre.org

@Ryle

Wonderful, thank you!

@battaglia01

@pwinn The advantage of the UFI, as you point out, is a more positive approach.. The idea is that anyone int he UFI is sort of "certified" to be a good-actor, at least, so far as the ethics of the UFI go..

So it has two advantages..

1) is it lets other instances outside of the UFI know i follow a certain minimal code of conduct

2) to add a zone of protection against people threatening to fediblock people if they dont block all the same people they do... by promising always to federate with other UFI members this makes them more immune to defederation so long as they remain a good actor.

@JonKramer We have already had two good discussions about the nudity issue... one she will be adding it later, but we had a quick back and forth... I think the best comrpomise there will be to allow top nudity but no genitals or sexual ones (like anal).

@friday

Sounds like if we had the same intent you should just join us and propose edits.. We would love to hear your ideas. The Gitlab is up so just hop on in and create any issues or merge requests and we will all discuss it.

@skanman @floppy @john @stevenclyman @robryk @ejg @dashrandom @Romaq @ichoran @AlanOutback @tsomof @aebrockwell @Ryle @tatzelbrumm @Gaythia @realcaseyrollins @stux@mstdn.social @stux@masto.ai @trinsec @khird @darnell @jq

@battaglia01

Was he?

@Ryle

I am digging some of the conversation this United Federation of Instances is creating. Lots of great ideas so far, every last one.

https://gitlab.com/ufoi/constitution/-/issues

#UFoI #UFI

@tatzelbrumm create a topic-branch (once just for you), push it there, go to the web-ui create a merge request off of it... select the option to delete topic branch once merged.

@battaglia01

Maybe we want to remove the whole "no-commercial" rule entierly.. youve convinced me of that personally.. Can you throw up an issue or merge request and ill be happy to back you up as we are in agreement.

@Ryle

@supernovae@universeodon.com

I totally agree with you.

See this revision of the abstract a user proposed. I think it is much better, in line with your concerns, and I approve of it myself.

https://gitlab.com/ufoi/constitution/-/issues/2

Please feel free to offer your own suggestions and throw in a merge request with your changes. Ill be happy to make the change once there is some discussion as to the best version.

@skanman @floppy @john @stevenclyman @robryk @ejg @dashrandom @Romaq @ichoran @AlanOutback @tsomof @aebrockwell @Ryle @tatzelbrumm @Gaythia @realcaseyrollins @stux@mstdn.social @stux@masto.ai @trinsec @khird @darnell @jq

@juddlegum Their demands seems reasonable enough to me.. i say let them have them :)

@Ryle

Yup that is the one.

@battaglia01

@realcaseyrollins

Untruths? lol... most people just call those lies...

@stux

@Ryle Sorry I had a brain fart, I thought for a se3cond I was talking about QOTO and not the UFoI

I take back what I said and agree with @battaglia01 that an exception for content creators should be allowed in the UFoI's constitution. QOTO will remain non-commercial however.

Hey do you want to try to create a merge request with your proposed change (either of you can)... also add yourself to the contributors if you arent already there.

@battaglia01 content creators can not use this platform to advertise anymore than others... with that said its ok if they share their content so long as they dont try to sell it here (such as including purchase links).. We try to conside rit on a case by case basis but generally if your posting with the intent to make money, content creator or not, its a no go. but you can talk about things you make money off of indirectly.

Unlisted is one of the privacy options on a post (see the little globe, hit that when writing a post). It means that only people who go to the post and followers will see it. It wont show up in the local or federated timelines.