🎓 Dr. Freemo 🇳🇱 @freemo@social.cleverlibre.org

@georgetakei

I like ya george, but this just is disinformation, we are better than this.

Perfect? I guess except for the fact that this literally never happened...

https://reason.com/2023/12/01/texas-newspaper-virally-claims-ted-cruz-wanted-to-limit-preferred-pronouns-his-bill-doesnt-do-that/

@realcaseyrollins

He followed me at some point, but I never followed back. I usually follow anyone who debates respectfully and productively. But he just never made the cut.

Now he thinks im going to loose sleep cause he unfollowed me. Like bro, thanks for saving me the time so I didnt need to mute ya for being toxic and making no effort to have a constructive conversation.

@paninid

@paninid

Dude you spent every reply engaging in mental masterbation and "gotchas" without a single iota of constructive discussion.

Trust me, you did us a favor, I was willing to give you, like most people the benefit of the doubt, but you clearly didnt deserve that.

@realcaseyrollins

@not_br549

Sure, and? I also remember the little old lady who was walking around confused and was probably another innocent. I expect there were quite a few caught up in the very clear rioting and violence who were themselves swept up in it and not guilty of much as an individual. Not sure what the point is in pointing them out, but yea, im sure there are plenty of people like that.

@beardalaxy @jeff @BlinkRape

@not_br549

Is that suppose to make a point. I have no doubt there are some exceptions fromt he day of people who were int he capitol building but otherwise did no harm.

Thats like arguing a murderer is innocent because some guy standing next to him got off as innocent in the same murder case... sure... thats a shitty defense though.

@beardalaxy @jeff @BlinkRape

@paninid

Yes they are, but no that is a rather absurd take IMO... People care about life being murdered, their seed may play a minor role in feeling they have a right to defend that life they helped create, sure, but its hardly the primary factor if anyone is being honest (which seems like you may not be but rather trying to push an agenda with whatever rehtporic you can muster).

I mean hell your not even against a particular stance (since I clearly stated the stance is debatable) you seem to care more about taking away peoples right to voice an opinion despite being the victim of any such decision (as we were all fetuses once). That is a disapointing stance to take to say the least.

@realcaseyrollins

@not_br549

We literally have photos I already shared of the police clearly blocking entry.

@beardalaxy @jeff @BlinkRape

@paninid

Never said or claimed I would... but then again I'll never be in the moral decision to murder someone either, yet i still have (and am not ashamed to have) an opinion on if murder should be illegal. Its almost like being the victim is more important than being the perpetrator when it comes to having an opinion... that said ya know what I have been? A fetus.

@realcaseyrollins

@not_br549

If you want footage of them breaking in through a door for some inane reason here ya go. The capital building door is clearly locked and off limits at this point as we see the vvrowd repeatindly bashing it in until the break through.

https://youtu.be/ukU_aTzmF3M?si=QCK2b0QCLREKL964

@beardalaxy @jeff @BlinkRape

@paninid

I mean thats the whole point of most laws, to legislate morality on people, that includes woman's issues and mens.

That isnt to say that abortion doesnt deserve debate, it does. But no one should be shocked that it is legislating morality, thats the whole point.

@realcaseyrollins

@paninid

Not sure what that means, but I wish (not the bedroom part but the small part).

@realcaseyrollins

@AT1ST

I also dont recall making any assertions about what welfare actually pays.. I made quite a few statements about what it should pay....

@RyanbeLyin @scottsantens

@AT1ST

Huh, I literally grew up on welfare until I used it to get out of welfare... I think I know quite well what it pays considering.

@RyanbeLyin @scottsantens

@wjmaggos Except the only reaason it happens at all is because everyone is suckered in by the fallacy in the first place.

The parties have literally told a lie that convinced everyone to vote for them despite everyone admiting no one really wants them, they are just the lesser of two evils.

@realcaseyrollins

Really? I usually lean towards the candidate that wants to kill the **most** babies... interesting take.

@beardalaxy

You realize I can post links to images if I want instead right?

@not_br549 @jeff

@wjmaggos Nah thats self-defeating logic. voting to eat slightly less wet shit because you think it might be marginally less disgusting than the wetter pile of shit is a really really bad way to apply strategy. If everyone thinks that way everyone eats shit. If everyone uses actual logic and votes for what is best, then you wind up getting something better.

@Pjcoyle Cant imagine why you would need to be convinced of it.

If we were voting on what to eat for dinner, and the top two choices are wet shit and slightly less wet shit, are you going to vote for one of the wet shits or you going to vote for the pasta?

I'd vote for the pasta for one reason, my top concern would be to not eat shit. So even if i thought my vote would loose I'd still vote for it just to strengthen the third party vote so allt he morons voting for shit despite no one liking shit, might realize there is a chance for something other than shit even if it lost last election but happened to get a higher percentage than it might normally, giving hope for future elections.

Seems completely idiotic to just in unison go "lets all vote for shit cause its what everyone did last time". when really your just taking the same idiotic logic everyone else took which is the **only** reason the logic plays out.