The rest below I'll work on... pinch of salt for now and ignore grammatical errors... just the question and few points below will help consider the 'game' they got us playing (more like playing to lose)...

We can do things without, maybe not everything... but then heading toward *more things without* is better than asking money because other people ask money.

So genuinely might depend on your belief if we can get to the days before (much less money and yeah nature ware 'inconvenient and harder work' which anyway if we don't do gets us into concrete boxes which isn't great either and nowhere to grow with everything concreted over)

Just asking anything is hard and possibly not sane as eventually all just spirals up crazily... so asking a bit of money (or really those working to share with those not working as there are never enough jobs (i.e. scarcity made by man) and stic to the real economy NATURE / PLANET / PEOPLE / HUMANITY / FOOD / SHELTER without the middle-men in between siphoning / robbing things.

This is the main main thing to choose as it runs through everything else and taints / contaminates it IF you ever speak of it!

It is possible without, only depends how far it gets and the 'next problem' to deal with because often money uses force or ignorance to 'achieve' but we're all looking for peace not war (which is almost why money was invented / used for / still is in a large % or taxes and loans etc)

and yeah depending how you see it (which I see, and is fair enough for you) then one just has to say