reply for atyh's comment mostly,
I like the idea of a constitution being above in authority (if I get that right) but I also have the feelings asking me if that is enough - but a good start if confidence shifted to something that is more concrete and ideally highly voted for....
On a slight tangent for voting with authority or organisation...
I'm happy to receive DM's if needed about ideas how to manage 60%/40% voting splits or what system can mean nobody loses out if voting for this or that (in or out something)... perhaps both are good, both are bad, or both have reasoning you don't want to cross. Something where there is much 'less loss' or less of an ultimatum or competition this or that even if it kind is... just *not accepting to ignore any voters at all*... as everyone is assumed genuine for this example... but how to respect them?
Make another separate process? Then eventually help grow it's own organisation (and even contract once they see it's maybe not the way?)....
The hierarchy, Board of Directors/control I see can be a good emergency switch but for the most part over-powering by default and perhaps they want the others to have there way (my question is how to get everyone happy!)
