Tech is given to people ONLY as far as that Tech serves the Technocrats first and is regulated by them in a bigger benefit and bigger way ...
So why do I write this and why is it really important to *everything*?
I can agree with others as a small % of the first sentence, that things seem to be good or feel good but in the larger scope it's almost all only for power and authority yet again... not for real diversity or human consciousness and that left unchecked, undeveloped, is terrible.
STEM doesn't seem to be so conscious in the same way as above, giving what we have but at the cost / ignoring what's happening overall.. and that's why STEM since day one has snow balled more of the same old equation - POWER TO GOVERNMENT / RICH PEOPLE.
It's not any kind of human development, sympathy, teaching that perpetuates out of the previous line.
Those types of people and controllers (manipulators) would never allow anything that undoes themselves (that's the biggest factor here). 'Their' country (they perceive to own us and we take identity by asking them), so risking things in any shape or form is just incredibly stupid for them. Make people pay in soft long drawn ways or hard and fast where nobody can see or isn't looking (abroad).
SURE give some % rewards to people, even let them experiment and play a bit, it's worthy to explore and test all possible ways so then 'we' can adapt / patent / block (de facto or not) / regulate / legislate / legalise / make illegal things / give it back to those in control etc etc... that's a turbo mechanism that all people are seeing / feeling how horrible it is (even from comfort of their home).
If you don't believe the bigger reasons to regulate it all is not for these 'suspicious' power-conquest type reasons then I think is perhaps the main problem in conversations to overcome - you want the sweets from the drug dealer? You believe they would not 'stoop so low' and entertain any anti-establishment stuff.
Seriously anyone including STEM needs to wake up and add a bit of consciousness to all things and realise who they are working for and why it's allowed to continue.
Everything 'could be used for good' but it's not you or me they ask, instead MORE laws, more computerisation (enforcement / restriction through computers / gates), more putting people put into 1 or 0 systems/matrices/boxes, etc = MORE OF THE SAME BAD OR SAME WAY OF LOOKING AT PEOPLE.
I wrote this for general conversational awareness too as it can be a fork in the road if you believe this fork in the road why people above do things, or don't believe (and it's good to be aware and even say it neutrally inside the politics)
THEY KNOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING VERY WELL!
Some might say call them professional bastards (job as mini-mercenary) or politics as a game by the rulers (no real justice just token gestures of...) but even I wouldn't expect those leaders to do what they did and that game every 3/4 years is like a rotating door with rotating faces...
Some people are going to argue that they are grateful for being alive and getting products / technology / energy BUT others ARE ALSO MORE ungrateful and more aware about how it's a lot more of a negative now and back then (when we knew even less) and the trajectory is killing in it extraction (energy and people directly and indirectly siphoned) and that's even if it wasn't ever about politics and decisions were never made with self-interest before the individual populous.
For a long time (all of history perhaps) we are seen as surfs / peasants / respected only with power (inherited also) and still arguably are minor point or just pawns to play... so AUTHORITY THEMSELVES of course would always play us to do their dirty work rather than themselves - we are lower class / un-elite / non-controllers... so even if I don't put as low-lifes, we're still just 'normal' and no elites to pay attention to.
This all depends if you agree and believe for a looong time people were selfish / authoritarian / patriarchal / attacking / territorial.... lol let me close the dictionary...
...and really even in soft or hard tactics it may come down to which you believe more and can accept is doing the most damage to short and long ter...
They do for people to get for themselves - THERE IS A LOT OF HISTORY AND PRESENT DAY THAT SEEMS VERY CLEAR WHEN COMPARED TO THAT.
Neutrally I say with history and my limited experience as my witness, that those "professional bastards" (I mean people paid / given incentive to do what usually people wouldn't do) have leaders / bosses that have not changed and even like their work... better they have some point than someone else in this forced equation.
SUMMARY / TL;DR
They would never release anything or let it last long that is not used to perpetuate money and siphon human energy further.
So I accept we get 'benefit' BUT IT'S LESS OF A BENEFIT ONLY IF THEY GET BIGGER BENEFITS THAT DOMINATE / EXCLUDE US MORE. They really really wouldn't ask us and really are not!)
