How close were Adam & John to the truth of “how the world really works?”
First, No Agenda barely ever had an affirmative vision. The podcast is mostly posting clips and criticizing them. The media is BS. They were ahead of the curve on that one, anyone paying attention agrees now.
On subjects where I do have expertise, they can have some pretty shitty takes that are presented with confidence (Gell-Mann Amnesia Effect).
1/X
No Agenda probably drifts too far towards capital-C conspiracy than base reality. There are things they call an op that are not an op, but you can never tell which are which.
Constructing a more mature worldview can be done by combining the thoughts of the following people …
Scott Adams, Bret Weinstein, Thomas Sowell, Nassim Taleb, David Graeber, Jordan Peterson, Tim Pool, Ron Paul, Michael Malice, James Lindsay, Greg Lukianof, Elon Musk, Eliyeser Yudkowsky, and many more
2/X
@Cosmic
Hi - I like the 2nd post in this multi-part message;
█ Lately was thinking how exclamation mark type media (imagine the "!" at the end of sentences in text or video) is what sells or keep things going... but yes after a while more is needed...
█ Lately #UFC (Martial Arts competition) has got this kind of Wrestling rivalry with ! marks and less honourable comments (using things against each other more personal and outside of the ring / cage)
█ I also liked that you mentioned a list of people worth going to as a 'go to' list... this could be used for other things as stirring the shit show stuff isn't great after the education or feeling has been received that yes "this is how they do it" and we need the "what next..." options for all the various type of individuals...
ANSWERS AND SUGGESTIONS WELCOME :)
(i.e. how to not get caught in the vortex of stirring it and spreading it and instead spreading better things !!)
