FreeSchool: Learn Respect Love @freeschool@social.cleverlibre.org

Alright
-will send email / few more msg after this for b-roll type stuff

- Will tell friends / send to followers, thanks for permission to remix

-->I *really* recommend putting all track names at the end of episodes, at least in small print:

Why?... ---> because there is a constant MUSIC movement happening *itself* from what people like and:
---> we collecting things
---> we remember them by track and episode sometimes
---> can bring people and artist together or help re-seed artists also (but I get if contact from artist or over-exposure is not wanted by writing it)
---> you might get less emails about specific tracks (which are hard to put name to long after finished)

it's mixture of psychology and mixed mediums uniting too for something memorable (like if I was to play mp3 again I'd remember to remix it or send the video out to my follow list since it's in the eco-system of it all).

Keep it going overall is good and audio is something while people work and can work with you at same time or in spirit....

P.S - Track name is:
Ruby My Dear - Clinpf Eepfwoof
@55secs

@submedia
Appreciate the work.
Other than monetarily or following I'm not sure how to support...
I know one day we must all decide when a big decision comes but for now as an over-educated one somewhat I'm seeing the need to combine more and more (and more) as the working which for me is fun during retirement of myself, so for now I'm asking

1) If I can submit somewhere my small works towards sub.media (small clips that I think would be more easily insertable and small files good for remixing in and taking audio from... a lot I do is audio so could send by email or put it somewhere - most is not on my profile or not on website - so online doesn't have everything, and maybe it could be only relevant only some way rather than everything ever done)

2) If I can remix your work / cut clips / upload it here / remix it a bit / give credit (asking for permission)

3) What is the end music of this episode called or link please - could it be Syndrome's work? It's also attached to hear it again... good stuff

@rlamacraft
Sometimes you know you that's good and interesting because you have to learn more and 'figure it out'.

Sometimes you pass the comment but anyway write a border-line useless comment half-saying "now you have to explain all 3 metaphors or just go back to explaining the original one!" :)

@tromprojektas
What is the answer specifically supposed to mean and do for me?

@lucifargundam
Agreed. Often I consider the opposite for those that will use money as a kind of 'just go with the flow' idea (similar to what I was saying in another post about shitposting seemingly working better in many ways though it's not obvious at first and at least achieves x y z whereas we others are quite static / comfortable / too polite perhaps)

So the opposite or discomfort would be dealing still with money (had to convince my fingers to actually write that) but increment and increasingly more and more work in-house and live in-house unofficially !

Minority is still large enough to generate money to backup some causes (churches especially collect and could do something ... but where does it go and how bold are they?)
So what to do with it anyway other than feed people for the cause and re-cycle all that internally?)... so yes pay forward and build bridges ahead of time or just viral people since multi-work is one idea for cheating the mono-work type culture which pays more often...

and also hitting in one hard punch if we can't sustain something more amicable...

So more on that idea below not to distract but really seems well - original:
If we simply had a few rich among us umbrella us an 1 house as a kind of do-or-die production (live together, be political in many ways, produce anime / cartoon / voice-overs / mini films, everything we can) then yeah just maybe something comes out of that... but basically pots of money to 'buy' some people time and get out of renting individually (donations burn too quickly) and those richest (whoever feels like it) basically give it since they are quite comfy or 60+ already and realise they will die soon!
(it is hard to give it away but death help you part with that quicker)..

Finally, back to what you said: I agree children have more potential in many ways. Just implementing after imagining it is the hard adult part perhaps.

@gabriel
I like it / make sense.
Interesting about death penalty / dissolving any organisation when guilty of crimes.
True they get away with too much (robbery and get small punishment)...
To move to a more final overall question, because of my fear people might be too ready (or desperate) to take any money (since once you are born you have little chance otherwise but follow domino or waterfall of money) so if that binds you in many ways... my question is how to live less without them (if we imagine we could ignore their rules in theory or other unrealistic things)... just how not to take money and even unrealistically stay alive from this position or other positions (I guess going back to less population will help? I mean like half the planet to get people respecting the value of each person since they will need them more?). Any wild idea ok even remotely.

Same question again: BIG question for me always comes down to how to survive without money or much less... as the political being and unfairness from root is money itself (%'s added infinitely, debt, usury, banks as authority, validators, gate-keepers, etc)

@atyh @gabriel

reply for atyh's comment mostly,

I like the idea of a constitution being above in authority (if I get that right) but I also have the feelings asking me if that is enough - but a good start if confidence shifted to something that is more concrete and ideally highly voted for....

On a slight tangent for voting with authority or organisation...
I'm happy to receive DM's if needed about ideas how to manage 60%/40% voting splits or what system can mean nobody loses out if voting for this or that (in or out something)... perhaps both are good, both are bad, or both have reasoning you don't want to cross. Something where there is much 'less loss' or less of an ultimatum or competition this or that even if it kind is... just *not accepting to ignore any voters at all*... as everyone is assumed genuine for this example... but how to respect them?

Make another separate process? Then eventually help grow it's own organisation (and even contract once they see it's maybe not the way?)....
The hierarchy, Board of Directors/control I see can be a good emergency switch but for the most part over-powering by default and perhaps they want the others to have there way (my question is how to get everyone happy!)

@gabriel
Think it was good to highlight *people's* because I personally might have misread it or not seen the clear importance or emphasis
(so well done for that)

I think it would be wrong for me to consider that know any of these terms deep enough or even to others to comment, but instead more safely ask/explore

- what do *people's* property rights mean in your ideal world?
-- (for example no corporation or very much limiting corporation and more back to real entities 1 human container or family as owner?
--- (no virtual containers / names hiding behind them) and directly

I'm trying to clarify how and if it would work (if you mean keeping it almost to real people only instead than virtual / corporate brands but also you might mean something else which this comment can act as a guide for what I might be thinking of as "people's property rights" and if big business exists in your own theoretical or ideal world or not as a start for whatever you mean.

@gabriel
I was going to ask if you wanted comments or were looking to explore... then I saw comments... but anyway I will still ask if you want more or if that's enough in general before adding anything...

@Acer Perhaps peer is not the right word (maybe I'd like to check with you).

Peer might not be used or suited for this context.

For example "co-worker" seems better for writing or categorising another person etc, not really peer (especially as a manager)

co-worker (just for another example) is
an associate that one works with.