Show newer

My favorite Mastodon 3.5.0+ feature is that if you have full text search on your server, you can search for

"from:username@anyserver.whatever foobar"

And it will filter search results for just posts made by username@anyserver.whatever. This is a further refinement to the existing search, so the limitation of "posts that either were made by you or you have favorited, bookmarked, or are replies to you" still applies. It's SO MUCH EASIER to search through my old posts now.

Is you want to connect to a remote file system with , you can use . You can mount a remote drive on your device and use it like a local drive.
For more details: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SSHFS

@Pat
The answer is Tyranny..,
It's easier and faster to follow (just do nothing, ignore, overlook things, follow & trust blind, stay busy working for others for unknown reasons etc)

But yes we can work on everything if one wants.

I'm not sure about either definition now... even though I made it.

Probably I've misrepresenting life probably but choosing over-simplified polar extremes. That's why I'm stopping - this is enough stuff from me for now.
Please ignore.

More active you are the more you step on toes, but if you can absorb that and even fix things to help it on it's way then you have progress.

-Worst case is bad dancers with bad teachers,
-Best case is a hive full of activity and repairing / feeding cells + getting the honey (progressing activity regardless of ability and increasing of human intelligence within a hive,)

Having tech orientated things are good but exclusive to the point where *perhaps* it's only tech people... and that's a problem that needs solving in itself... And abot different motivations or priorities in people to still be included in your project... to do satellite things that make the orbiting pull for others to join in or get interested... 

MAIN POINT

Using all of them (people) regardless of skill perhaps. They can do satellite things that make the orbiting pull for others...

MORE AROUND THE TITLE AND PARAGRAPH ABOVE...

I MIXED TWO THINGS IN SUMMARY:

-almost exclusive / excluding tech-only things being an issue and limitation itself
-different motivation or priorities in people... (using all of the different kinds regardless of skill perhaps or just not expect it to be #1 all the time)

The thought actually started about people and keeping a circle of individualism and their own order or motivation or priority (probably 2 different things but can be the same) and including them as much as possible whichever way we do things as a project or whatever generally....

Using all of them (people) regardless of skill perhaps. They can do satellite things that make the orbiting pull for others...

PRIORITY LIST / FAVOURITE THINGS:

Everyone probably has something they 'know' they are right in.. we just have to help each one of us understand it better AND get to work amongst that (basically it's not important if it's 4th or 5th important on their personality list but using all motivation is priority instead of many not understanding and not being able to accept others unless it's #1 on their list... #2 to #10 are all doable but it seems a bit exclusive now, also reflected in the phrase "what's you job" we love to do many things, and jobs are arguable what people are not paid to love or paid because they have to be and are strange-held less-than-moral money as a currency itself / banks etc)

BACK TO PRIORITY OR PERSON NATURE OR SOMETHING....
I personality see it like a list each person has, where someone puts a priority of something more than the other thing, more or less than another person BUT the point is not to as priority but accept all are individual and instead find a place for them.

I think it's problematic to avoiding accepting someone is individual and not asking them what they want and even though power-dynamics don't allow it, still in a community we can rope more people by asking and finding something to do.

SUMMARY:
Having tech orientated things are good but exclusive to the point where perhaps it's only tech people and so no wonder others are not involved. A tough one.

Using all of them (people) regardless of skill perhaps. They can do satellite things that make the orbiting pull for others...

If a mass of people believed in something that is imperfect is that bad... what level of imperfect do you wait for?... 

If a mass of people believed in something that is imperfect and was hitting hard (despite the imperfection), what is the level of imperfection or understanding before you (individually) would accept it and dive in much more (or just not hate others for it)...

(my main direction here is people are aiming for perfection, and while it's probably best to align things or increment with highest % first... saying something like Bitcoin is irrelevant (not meaning to trigger you on Bitcoin the word) but anything that has achieved making Banks much relevant (for example in 4days on Oct 2021 Bitcoin transacted 120Billion in under a week (about 4 days) (I don't mean other shitcoins or crytography, not those).... so if that is a bar and it wasn't 'evil' transactions doesn't that say something like "it's working to burn the banks by avoiding FEES, %, State control, Red-tape, 'Verification', Shut-down (swallowing accounts of problematic people) etc etc etc)

Forget the word bitcoin but if anything does that, when are we ready (or what %) before you step in more / read up on it?

Or do you just keep going with the banks which is ultimately the source of all almost all our problems. <----- I shit you not or at least 2nd / 3rd / 4th fuelling anything as the main problem.

Mixed feelings but I'm asking basically about achieving perfection which is perhaps lesser possible and only waiting (though I'm not sure, could waiting win it for us or not just regrow another bank when one falls?).

The necessity in life's design to opt-out of the massive infrastructure and not be at their whim (as an individual or local gov). To have our own mini-choices (NOT BE DE-PERSONALISED). 

Notes from a video + weaving best bits together a bit so it's mixed but hopefully shows some good notes (together or as paragraphs)...

It's about the necessity to opt-out of the massive infrastructure or have nice choices and not be at corporations total whim (as an individual or local gov itself).
To have our own choice and NOT BE DEPERSONALISED) is to be more sovereign.

Slight tangent but similar

When your Operating System governs your locality's decision-making... then this is becoming more powerful than your Government or everyone following their ways reflect their ineffectiveness in this (like just having always-online operating systems) just because it's easier (funded) or less technical (easy install)

Linux (LinuxMint / Debian) install still needs tech-literate people though it seems a good choice.

The above does seem hard if you're trying to manage masses of people and somewhat need to standardise / shepherd... but I guess the line of ignorance is just everyone following nobody or one big corporation as the shepherd itself (rather than individuality or intelligence) so corps are clearer and better funded.... which is arguably what government is supposed to be like Microsoft represented back in the day paving the way for word processing and computer operating systems for the layman / average person... (even if questionably so if you consider Linux still needs tech-level help to setup or not get stuck whereas windows gets you in point and click style.... I could be wrong on this!)

SUMMARY:
The above paragraphs help us see why people go for big corps (as a gov trying to standardise / depersonalise everything or gov just going with big corps)

I skimmed of this from a video so it's mixed but hopefully shows some good notes (together or as paragraphs)
Linux Mint should ditch Ubuntu and here's why (a Chris Were talk)

tilvids.com/videos/watch/2f27e

Freedom versions are needed for pay-to-win and rewards / loot crates...

Better incentives or appreciation / interactivity between people overall without making it top heavy / only about that

Getting high from participation / busy-ness between us / fuelling our own fire.

Credit for participation itself would be productive.

(I would like you to say on what you think that means, even before if it's useful or not to help me develop this component in interaction without overdoing it)

You can interact with the videos boosted by this account without leaving Mastodon.

You can watch, comment, like, share, subscribe all from within Mastodon. You don't need to click on the video's link at all.

PeerTube and Mastodon federate together using the same technical standard, so actions you take in Mastodon will appear next to the video in PeerTube.

See the attached images for more details.

#Fediverse #PeerTube #Mastodon

@barefootstache
In Firefox for example it does prettify the code (like that phrase by the way) but

- comes out more of a numbered list each with lots of nested in more of collapse/expand signs !
- long lines are abbreviated

so a bit better but nothing like
- something scrollable
- or human readable better than a long list of chronological / incremental numbers

Looking for something that shows the content or subject instead of headers first... or even completely without

Human vulnerability (talking weakness) safely as the way forward for humans... 

One of those counter-intuitive, backwards things that works forward in terms of human advancement...

If you expose yourself measurably and encourage a regular circle I can *guarantee* you will find progress (unless everyone is quite perfect)
We learn much less without being open (even reservedly open is ok)
We can let culture die purely from not practising circles and admitting things and then offering help but accepting if people don't want (like me and my google thing trying to get people off it and trying not to be angry about ignorance)

NOTE: You can also learn a subject and without exposing ANY human vulnerability or humanness this kind of knowledge leaves behind actual human change or contact. I measurably feel this is true when you don't put human in the picture or flow chart.
In the end I think is where we're at most often.
I vote to speak more in a circle and take take turn moderating / having fun!

I don't want to hear about the safety, nobody is on Mastodon yet lol ! Jokes aside if we hear each other speak and question enough we take care of all this as long as we're not too pessimistic (because that also puts people in the defensive positions / labels them). This is a community effort and this I feel is part of it... especially since all around culture(s) and culture of socialising (local or online) is dying or limited to text.

Human heart and soul come out even if it's protectively.

Some people seem to want tyranny instead of freedom because... 

- it's easier to follow (to understand tyranny is easier (you don't need to understand just follow, sign here etc)
- easier excuses for doing less when we give up one's own power to resist
- it's true it's suicidal going against the system (going against that what doesn't support our logic which makes suicides a pure act rather than living with it but not seeing a way out)
- jealousy of the varied freedom, it's a lot more clearly equalising under tyranny and people don't want others to have it different (they think it can be / should be a straight line where life isn't, even on nature level or geography etc)
- sets the bar 'correct' and makes straight what in life is bending and instead of just to accept this man has tried to make / normalise with maths etc
- what can't be counted is too diverse as a number or infinite attribute so we let other manage this (inside many containers too or a varied of category and multiply values itself it's definitely not easy and arguable shouldn't be valued as a number or give to others to manage)

MY XP:
Even in my lifetime, with farmer that have and don't share, people do tend to lock themselves in for one reason or another...

MY CONCLUSION:
- it requires more talking and thus more skill in communication for freedom
- it require consistency, it's not a 5min ' job '
- it's not in governments vision
- it requires more time, more conflict, more heart, more breaking and moulding back together, more logic, more empathy....
- everything so much easier to blame system and reap the benefits (overpaying everything and thinking health, schools, things are free)
- people don't see they are going to need to physically fight one day
- people don't want to talk forever about freedom more than complain (this could naturally measurable by posts seen online AND also proportionate to level of training or education and simply talking more than 5mins+ which usually people reach boiling point and have to suppress as long as possible )
- People didn't want / don't want to expose their inherent flaws and work on them and only wanted to talk when he wanted (which wasn't much also unless we were drinking beer and everything trickles out then or is a shit-show)

------------------------------
That's some basics tp why some people want tyranny instead of freedom...
------------------------------

Exposing my own weakness (in logic or perfection) is the way to go in everyone I think... expose and admit, know yourself and allow others to blend into that and help gently others admit and work with each other rather than shell defence. Expose, accept however much we can change and move on.

Otherwise it's stalemate or tyranny... you're choice.

Expose yourself measurably
or
learn much less / let culture die !

NOTE: You can also learn too much as a subject without exposing ANY human vulnerability or humanness and this kind of knowledge leaves behind actually human change or contact I measurably feel which in the end I think is where we're at most often.

Is it stealing from people if they almost totally willing give it up?

@stux Amazing!
MAGIC PEOPLE VODOO PEOPLE

If I was living back in the old days and I had never seen anything like this animation before then I would feel 1000 time what I'm feeling like now which is this is COMPLETE VOODOO !!!
And probably would have very angry feelings (from confusion and feeling threatened!)

a train... going in between pillars...
knocking cars out the way
and
going up a building... HOLY SMOKES! VOODOO!

This mix of reality and animation (or wahever you call it) is rather Shocking !
0_0

@lucifargundam
I know of big one's but looking for small and for meshing our own job services

Best ways to read json files offline ?

Something clear offline / standalone as much as possible .

Imagine reading your Mastodon exported profile (posts export to outbox.json for example) to view in something that looks similar without needing to Mastodon itself?

Or covert to XYZ? Suggestions, Thanks

@alcinnz

SUMMARY
1- The questionable nature of others / business (as a form of extraction method and a extension of gov itself)
2- Measurably to show really clearly in 1 picture they are doing it or deliberately / allowing it to exist to feed from it by design.
3- And talking about solutions. I'm happy to get together for a chat in a nice way to massage some of these topics, and something snappy as moderation to get best out of everyone ?

1- Liking the comments here, all of them
The questionable nature of others
Extraction - perhaps business (s a form of extraction method uitself and a extension of gov itself- all bad !

2- Also I see as a tearing point between people (unless they agree already) is how we measure their actions or position.

I think lists of acronyms or stats or help:
-DRM, showing restrictions to online media
- Linux is run on 99% of the world's top servers etc

( just anything that can show the range of technique on 1 list / map diagram / wordcloud (I'm going to go off looking after this!)

So basically this comment was about measurably or quickly demonstrating it is what they are doing and anyway effectively in corporate bubbles it's doing a good 'job' of that even if they don't mean it so what do we do about that?

- I see as a giving of hammer and realising people can use it for bad also but now not know what I ca do different apart from not give it or impose legal restriction, enforcing them (layers) and heavier NON-profit clamps
or other profit-prevention.

3- Tough one, but if you agree we're going towards free (as in freedom, more-financially-free and even reducing mass profit because it inversely proportionate to constricting / restricting the freedom of others.... then yes something needs to be done! Or just doing things less as a kind of helping more top stop the corporate parts....

Quickly written - anything not sure about DM or happy to audio chat.

Show older
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.