Show newer

People will learn that the cheaper or easier way is often more expensive in the long term... 

People will learn that the cheaper or easier way is often more expensive in the long term...

Over time it costs people more than just financially but their life!! and in other areas of life too - our human rights, the land, increasing consumptions and habits... not good)

Cheaper and easier can suddenly burn us in the short-term also because I see money is burning the candle at both ends and burning and it's people at the same time in all ways possible (mathematically / technically / biologically / geographically / etc) by those in control duplicating the same mentality changing hands to the same template.

If not now then all the time money is doing the bad work while it makes workaholics out of people losing their life and rights to it.

SOLUTIONS?

We too individually can be blamed and need to work out something better than only working for others in their matrices (rows and columns) and creatively be motivated to do something else, almost do or die. Ask / give / take / give what we can... make space for people to do something as token gesture or more. Make space and people ill fill it.

Motivated more than money we need to MAKE TIME for human things (audio conversation is my best balance of all the worlds I feel so far as it includes exploration and discovery and is manageable worldwide and instant like "Jitsi Meet" browser chat).

Something to keep us motivated and playing / funnelling work to the right causes and teams. Being careful not to get bought out.

Conversation welcome... it's not easy but I think we can increment back in time what they were taking away (the human aspects) and solve things since many of us are in privileged places or spaces to undo or implement things - to grow people's mind better than the system does.

Berne Convention, is an international agreement governing copyright,... 

Berne Convention, is an international agreement governing copyright,

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berne_Co

Some clippings of page / interesting bits:

The Berne Convention was developed at the instigation of Victor Hugo of the Association Littéraire et Artistique Internationale. Thus it was influenced by the French "right of the author" (droit d'auteur),
which contrasts with the Anglo-Saxon concept of "copyright" which only dealt with economic concerns...

In Kernel v. Mosley (2011), a U.S. court "concluded that a work created outside of the United States, uploaded in Australia and owned by a company registered in Finland was nonetheless a U.S. work by virtue of its being published online".
However other U.S. courts in similar situations have reached different conclusions, e.g. Håkan Moberg v. 33T LLC (2009). The matter of determining the country of origin for digital publication remains a topic of controversy among law academics as well.

A 2009 decision of a Delaware Federal District Court) held that the protections of the Berne Convention are supposed to essentially be "frictionless", meaning no registration requirements can be imposed on a work from a different Berne member country. This means Berne member countries can require works originating in their own country to be registered and/or deposited, but cannot require these formalities of works from other Berne member countries.

In the Internet age, unrestricted publication online may be considered publication in every sufficiently internet-connected jurisdiction in the world. It is not clear what this may mean for determining "country of origin".

If the author is unknown because for example the author was deliberately anonymous or worked under a pseudonym, the Convention provides for a term of 50 years after publication ("after the work has been lawfully made available to the public"). However, if the identity of the author becomes known, the copyright term for known authors (50 years after death) applies.

SOUNDS VERY... ERR MESSY / POLITICAL / SUBJECTIVE
COPYRIGHT COULD GO WHEREVER THEY CHOOSE OR HAS TOO MANY RULES!

CREATIVE COMMONS MIGHT BE A GOOD IDEA / BETTER CHOICE PERHAPS (I'm still learning):

freeschool.0id.org/creative-co

Metrics of a Matrix <-- look at the language and meaning... 

Metrics is a way of doing things and measuring mostly by numbers.
This is a root problem when everything is motivated or judged or measured in numbers (Matrix has a similar meaning of mathematical numbers in boxes, grids or rows and column). This in itself is an numerical ENCLOSURE.

Here's some more on that related to the film, but the above is the cold reality that humans judged or valued by numbers is one of the first deadly mistakes and all goes downhill after that...

SO WHY METRICS?
AND WHY MATRIX (MATHS OR THE FILM) ?

1- Well we became as deadly or as inhuman as the agents, working in the modern day for numbers that are never satisfied and judged / fudged by other people higher up the food chain (living off those lower down).
You might not see it but it's the same old with the new old.

In the eliminating human things is what we do by deal with mainly... how we approach life and ignore the non-numerical (human being's feelings, needs, wants) and treat them like what? Maybe robots?

Some simplified counting of the world is simply not how simple it is and those that force these templates (all governments) they know it and set up shop.

The number on our head is judged by the profit % - otherwise no government really cares and would leave you for dead like they did before or just kill you if you didn't want to work for them or give taxes (they had batons and people back then too).

It is a trick of maths on humans to think only number and money is going to do it for people - actually it's oppression by those that use it because it is working well for them in certain ways and cuts out the other caring sharing planetary stuff. All of that is incompatible / disrespectful to dominating your culture or taking over the planet as many empires still are trying to do through government companies more than visibly killing.

Numbers are a downgraded representation of a human. Totally and fundamentally disrespectful and taking away their inherit individuality.

Numbers try to standardise and bring what has too many too many variations of 1 or many persons valuation and feelings at any given time.

Numbers (and their controllers which are theiving humans don't forget) expect people to swim or die, not matter if some cannot do maths or hate it because of those political behind it and pushing innocent passive aggressive numbers.
An ultimatum to participate in the program or face avenues of jail (another good business if not laws, courts etc etc).

Almost everything is calculated to know where things fall and be caught or put in it's place by the system by paying people to do it's profit making work. This is not a humanitarian affair.

Individuality is sacred as are many things and putting a number on it is itself a big mistake or the gravest mistake.

Standardisation and fitting in tight boxes a type of death people are forced or coerced into (also parents are clueless).

--------------------------------

2- And then on top of that (compound damage) is that previous generations tried to turbo the using for calculating for lifestyles which further distanced our own cousins and mother nature like a habitat to an animal being cut off and a false numerical one put in its place.
Just look at a city - nothing growing just crazy minecraft type over-building... it's gone too far.

Even considering if people like concrete block, it's not for everyone and nature is running out and being buried underneath.

I'm assuming people like nature a bit more than concrete since that is where food, material, relaxation and many things comes from.
Rather than the reverse EVERYTHING being concreted and imprted blocks from China or wherever far away burning up fuel to get here.

All is related and has a pay back unless we slow it down and stop it.

Related to food or everything else is this peace of mind - the work is not peaceful now, not towards sharing... agents are everywhere and they too feel they need to stay alive, by securing / killing people.

SUMMARY
Respect is not a number always and is variable - people can be happy in poor conditions but not in rich ones.

Valuing things are illegitimately trying to convert people into numbers - ecological systems do not work solely on this basis and have those other unnumbered attributes which are needed and relative to them and to everyone also.
These are almost dismissed / avoided / dis-counted and
non-existent in most equations and therefore our habitat and our selves are devalued.

We have so many LIVING functions to many to measure and not even worth doing (it's for living not always measuring)

Life should be sacred - not just maths at the hands of abusers, leader, liers, politically motivated people etc....

From millions of years of layers of plants and the nutrition / stored energy we can do things together (like we do now) but away from the preying on people mathematically. We need to solve that and realise numbers are not the way and life can preserve itself using it's own self-restoring system as it slowly dies (so more slowly not getting so rammed by mankind hell-bent on generating debt and expecting people to try catching with arbitrary infinite strings of numbers owned by banks selling money itself with sole power to give and restrict).

---------------------------
BOOST IF YOU GET IT ---------------------------

See the word meanings from different angles.

The of a
(Tight numerical control / an increasing numerical enclosure upon mankind)

People rather deal with code or text more than humans, but this is exactly the point and cause of communication breakdown... and perpetuates distance... 

Since the method of text mostly is just not enough / not real enough / not human enough, then the cold world is exactly what we get when we also don't practise warmer contact. You might prefer your machine more than people.
And while it seems responsive / perfect etc... still overall it's humans we need practise with more than coding or text which can continue anyway along side.

"The hardest arithmetic to master is that which enables us to count our blessings."
— Eric Hoffer

Psychology behind anime or anime-type things always seem to focus or show lots of leg or girl-orientated innocent-portraying sexual stuff or kinda "I'm not sure if this is pervy type stuff") - Anyone want to explain the hook / why ? (even partially)

SoundCloud - Best audio interface online ?

- Can transition pages without breaking audio play
- Clickable visual to skips / check middle of track etc
- Allows comments and add icons that people can mouse-over for tooltip info of comment

soundcloud.com/rl1805/paradise

Also can download from authors that allow public sharing already using this downloader... sclouddownloader.net/

Can anybody see privacy concerns embedding content like audio track here in Mastodon ?

By the way the song... woah! Play it twice!

Freedom TV / Audio idea + Way of Forward Linking / Webring / ... 

Free Software as a people or movement could also think about working on *exactly* the same things Capitalism has right now because it is giving the masses what they want and works (even in the wrong polarity).

My current ideas are:

- Own advertising and education system (something a bit better than our individual websites)
Call it a basic 'web ring' or education centre... either way WE MUST (as I see) do more advertising or educating more actively and even ' aggressive ' by Free Software standards almost too polite to really put logos etc on other things around (from software logos in videos to privacy products, minimal tech like raspberry pi etc)... Not all of these might fall under 100% freedom but for the parts we want MANY forward links could be chained / linked.

- Freedom TV / Audio --> I'd be happy to do some segments or use my own EXISTING material

WE ALL HAVE ENOUGH SOFTWARE / PRODUCTS / EXPRESSION TO MAKE OUR OWN THING.

THIS POST JUST NEED SNOWBALL ING AND MORE PEOPLE CAN LINK TOGETHER... I'M THE AUDIO INTERVIEW GUY OR COLLECTOR OF EDUCATIONAL FLOSS 'STUFF'
(FOR EXAMPLE....)

But many of us could also fill what space or slots there are....

If you want to s

I was expecting to get a lot more flak for some of my recent comments and dare I say claims!

But I also understand people in their field will never* want to come out

*hardly ever

If I made software that would track which corporate computer systems you are connecting to the most and show which brand of logos you frequenting / present at, would that help learn something ?

Would it help you to see what and where you are doing things or what your computer is doing and where it's feeding data ?

Assume it's 100% safe and privacy dominant with no other flaws etc just for now to get the main point and answer.

Would the difference in seeing 'Microsoft' 'Google' 'Bing' 'Meta logos or as a pie chart or % help you learn something?

Comments from video... interesting... 

A few comments to think about trust related, Russell Brand and about world in general...

Comment 1:
" It takes a bunch of bricks to make a wall "

Suggests to me to use each other to make something consistently.

And maybe in my mind everyone can be a different kind of brick and still can make some can of wall or construction (we won't have to be the same but we can match and pair things a bit).

Comment 2
" People do a lot of talking, but little real listening. Engagement is key. Otherwise, these channels are just dopamine boosts. "

Comment 3
I'm definitely at this place in my life right now being apathetic and feeling like taking a side is just foolish
Someone once said “if you want to destroy a nation you begin by destroying the language”

Comment 4
I'm suspicious of anyone who's on Google's payroll.

Comment 5
yep, i really feel like we are the silent majority, and most people do think critically and rationally

but it's usually the most misinformed caught up in their emotions that are the loudest. and people assume that is how most people feel.

Comment 6
Anything but the direct source is just a starting point, usually an entertaining one.

Comment 7
Decoy Voice, Tim Pool, Dore, and Brand is who I go to for honest reporting. I agree and disagree on a lot of issues with all of you, but you're honest

Comment 8
I don't trust actors. Period.

Comment 9
Harari talking about the "Useless Class" is terrifying.

Comment 9
Talk is cheap especially when not backed up by actions.
Actions like actually doing something to stop things like the NW disOrder agenda.
I don't hug & bestow kisses on my opponents

Comment 10
Can you put a price on peace?

Comment 11
Russell is dating Jemima Goldsmith, James Goldsmith's daughter. Jemima's brother, Zak is married to Alice whose grandfather is Jacob Rothschild, who employed their father, James.

Comment 12
Keep in mind, 33 is also the Christ number and many Christians revere it for that. They don't know the other connotations of it.

Comment 12
Look up on Duckduckgo
Russell Brand The Hidden Hand Freemasonry 33 is the Public Brainwash 360 is the top ( 2015 breakdown

Comment 13
i have decoyvoice.com/ and bitchute so far

from invidious.lunar.icu/watch?v=fE

The main thing we want to do is involve more and more people.

So the social has side has problems. I mean the difficulty is the social side not, the not the technical side, because on behalf of Free Software Community of I India, not me but the people of that, people of that community that I've can help we have run XMPP for like 8 years !

A video about how hearsay or hearing what other people think can make you think +/- about something or someone

+ lots of great quotes in and out of contexts (below)

Main one is:
Do you dislike a person because of listening to what they said and you even tried talked to them a few times directly?
Or are you the type of person to dislikes people based on what someone else said?

Tyranny looks like what is happening now...

The tyranny of Technocrasy or bureaucratic language, of the nimble tip-toe through linguistics, I can't see how that helps anybody...

Own nothing, have no privacy and be happy... Global reset "
(World Economic Forum reset type stuff)

I'm not a fan of disliking somebody because somebody not to like it

Do you really dislike [person] Joe Rogan because of listening to what he said or just because others said something (did you even try talked to them a few times directly?)
Or are you the type of person to dislikes people based on what someone else said?

One of the the main functions of power is to conceal power. There is kinds of a law of history.
If you don't have a lot of power, you try to exaggerate your power
If you have a lot of power you try to conceal it.


invidious.lunar.icu/watch?v=fE

Decoy Media doesn't seem bad as a YouTube channel (using Invidious filter)
invidious.lunar.icu/channel/UC

Summary of math and technology (sorry friends) but will also revise it if it's way out

SUMMARY I don't agree it's solving things more than it has the potential to, still humans always fuck it up. So we need to focus on that much more than going deeper in what is being abused.

What I agree is mostly all is good about XYZ field but the how / method / usage is problematic towards what it's for.
Quick stupid analogy... gun is good for quick-kill of a injured horse or animal (or even injured human) BUT sold and made an industry for war is not the way
(we still need to work on the way instead of falling for tech traps or non-thinking solutions - click click)

So I agree science and math do tend to make predictions and explain far better than anything else we know BUT some more things comes with this knowledge as exchange... with what seems like problematic numbers themselves or as another political filter of conversion made up of many people's theory and works.
It's not apolitical / politically neutral but it's hard to put a finger on who and why once transferred to a label or category called XYZ maths or you need to know that inside out to call out why doing things in this order makes it different than this order... which is the priority and why... do hidden accounting skills skew things like fiddling bank books (yeah of course just label x to something else).

Science or engineering can’t 'explain' some of these things perhaps as they also are just users (a bit more educated) and without humanitarian parts well it's just machine-mode / binary / formula / algorithms mostly (it seems).

Math and Sciences can 'predict accurately', but huaman still fuck it up or are the weak point.
How useful knowledge is (what humanitarian wrapping it's in) is arguably not fault of maths or sciences but I feel like unless there is the other parts like yin yang then it's like empty knowledge.
(otherwise we would have solve world hunger by now, and not caused it <--- a quick dumb statement but could be true if we were working towards this or not working towards it).

SUMMARY I don't agree it's solving things more than it has the potential to, still humans always fuck it up. So we need to focus on that much more than going deeper in what is being abused.

Will re-draft this but for now summary stands quite solid.

Also more here:
freeschool.0id.org/everything-

Players will always get played.
So choose which games you play and what will win wins for us all

HINT: Casino's and banks are BAD /
LOSE US ALL

Once you realise what tech and computers have cut out mostly (the human sides) then you realise where it's headed and it's limits.

Once you can see the analogy of a gun (technology in a chain towards doing one thing mostly) THEN YOU REALISE SOMETHING

YOU CAN UNDERSTAND THE DIRECTION PAVED / FUNDED FOR YOU ISN'T WHAT YOU WANT OR INTENDED...

Whilst lower forms of tech seems also extreme to include, if you consider the same people developing other things and 'quality controlling' that, they it's not surprising if everything, literally wasn't controlled and towards a similar mentality... the fast that it's a softer war (like price manipulation through clicks on airline tickets, or in the supermarket when shopping, should not be seems as much different than loaded technology based on one thing or getting one kind of result - and from patterns you can what that is if you call it any of these things:

- profit for further wars
- taxing people to keep them subservient / running treadmills
- slavery with costly luxuries

Tech is politically developed just as a gun is for doing one thing that revolves similar ends and means

NEW USERS - Direct Messages are sometimes not sent - CHECK THIS TO MAKE SURE.... 

GO TO DIRECT MESSAGES PAGE
IF YOU SEE YOUR OWN AVATAR PICTURE in the message list... then this means you may not have messged anyone but yourself!

So just to check you did or didn't message do a regular check of you DM page... (If I see my own logo then I know probably I forgot to put the persons name like @nameexample ....

LOTS of times I've just messaged myself and then realise by checking my own DM page! Hoorah!
Just copy and paste or re-draft message and add the name of person! Shit happens, just double check and all it catchable...

Summary - Check your Direct Messages regularly
Any messages with your own avatar / logo is potentially needing to be sent again."

"I'm a scientist. When I find evidence that my theories are wrong, it is as exciting as if they were correct. Scientific advance in either direction is still an advance." -- Stargate: SG-1

Promo screenshots from MicroProse's PC version of Magic: The Gathering from January of 1995, two whole years before the game's release.

Show older
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.