So, let's talk about communicating science for a moment - it's something people will need to consider as people figure out whether moving to Mastodon is worth it.

Firstly, #science already has a communication problem. And I don't mean #SciComm.

#SciComm and the idea of communicating science are NOT the same. One is a field of study and work, one is an essential for every single scientist.

We're once again seeing a post ✨elsewhere✨ going a bit viral for asking if you build humour into your talks or presentations.

We can't keep having this conversation. That we do is part of why science is incredibly inaccessible - even to scientists!

If your poster, paper, talk, and book all look the same - you are fundamentally failing all four audiences. And they are four separate audiences!

@tinysapien oh my God my thoughts exactly. We optimize on "being scientific". I would however also say that we need to consider the art in making a poster/talk

@gaymanifold I do mention that later - it's a by product of the devaluing of the humanities by far too many corners of STEM.

@tinysapien we as in stem need to start self reflecting on what we're doing in a similar way that humanities do

@gaymanifold That statement assumes that none of us work across the sciences and humanities - many people do. There's entire fields based upon the that fact.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.