So here's what Unity says the new pricing policy is, today (assuming it doesn't change again next week, like it did last week, and the week before).

https://blog.unity.com/news/open-letter-on-runtime-fee

Critical thoughts:

1. The fact that the new fees *only apply to 2024.1 and later* is the critical change here, and probably(?) avoids a lawsuit. This *will* have interesting ecosystem effects since many people will now want to stick on 2023.4 indefinitely. Possibly, libraries will latch to 2023.4 and never update.

2. The new policy is a bit confusing, though easier to understand than last week's. They now claim [over $1m revenue] they will charge *the lower of* 2.5% revshare, OR a charge per "number of new people engaging with your game" that they "calculate" based on your "self-reported data".

This "new installs" number is still untrustworthy gibberish. But now you can ignore it. The new "price" is 2.5% of revenue, possibly reduced arbitrarily.

Now the question is: Is this better or worse than Unreal?

(2, continued) Unity's new 2.5% revshare is lower than Unreal's 5%. But *Unreal doesn't charge a per-seat fee*.

A per-seat fee *plus* a revshare is sour tasting. Per-seat fees are really inconvenient for small operations where some or all of your devs may only use Unity part time. And those per-seat fees are (by my math) 5x higher than they were in 2021.

Overall, New Unity *probably* costs less than Unreal, *usually*. But awkwardly, any cases Unity costs more will be at the lower revenue end.

3. My gut is that if *this open letter's policies" were what Unity had announced to begin with, people would have been *annoyed*, as they were with the 2021 changes, but you wouldn't have seen a community collapse or mass exodus. However, I do not think this open letter will halt the mass exodus. The core problem is that *Unity can no longer be trusted*. You can consider the new 2024 prices acceptable. But now what you really have to worry about is how they will change in 2026.