@dragfyre Something like, "maintain a reliable transaction ledger given only unreliable witnesses to the transactions"

@khird ok, that explains a lot. 🤔 is anyone in the industry trying to come up with a workable solution for the inherent problems of sustainability, in terms of the ballooning demands on computational resources?

Follow

@dragfyre Sure, there are alternatives to proof-of-work schemes, most notably proof-of-stake. It's a different take on the same concept - a witness's reliability is linked to some scarce resource, either computing power in the case of proof-of-work, or previously earned currency in the case of proof-of-stake. A malicious witness must accumulate a significant quantity of that resource to make a false update to the ledger, which makes it cost-prohibitive to perform this type of attack. As long as honest witnesses cumulatively control more of the resource, the ledger is reliable.

You can imagine other such proof-of-X schemes where you base it on some other resource that's not environmentally destructive, but the underlying concept applies.

@khird This is interesting, and I wonder whether this doesn't just confirm what I've long suspected about innovation in the IT industry: That many of the problems we're trying to some with material means have important spiritual facets to their solutions. That is, while we could attempt to solve them with a new process or app, a big chunk of the technological dev work could be saved with the application of essentially spiritual solutions.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.