When scholars without expertise in infrastructure reform encounter the goals of the reform movement, such as e.g., replacing academic journals,
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5526634
they sometimes reflexively defend the status quo that served them well, e.g.:
“You ‘open’ wackaloons are forcing your revolution on us, against our academic freedom!”
I was asked to write a *one-page* cheat sheet with the evidence to counter such a reflex:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vjbohSsf-qy8ZkCvQ9FRlF9k1N12oSLu8qwXoKxjD2o/edit?usp=sharing
Can you/we improve on that?
#openscience
@brembs
A matter of taste, but that last paragraph was very strong and will get attention. Those interested will continue to the evidence / details.
@kjbinstl
Oh, you mean start with the assertion and list the evidence backing up the assertion afterwards?