Anybody here knows about a list of acadamecis on Mastodon working on ( ...)? Is it useful if I create one? @psychology
@academicchatter

Two upcoming workshops in and in Paris. Both free of charge (or very cheap) and both in late November:
- Auditory Development Workshop organized by Axelle Calcus and Laurianne Cabrera audidev.sciencesconf.org/ (20-21 November)
- Journées Perception Sonore co-organized by and sites.google.com/view/jps-2023 (21-22 November)
@psycholinguistics @psychology

Yesterday Géraldine Carranante presented our ongoing project to the conference. In short, we apply to the modality to uncover the cues used during . More info here: qoto.org/web/statuses/11057519

Anybody here going to Forum Acusticum in Torino next week? My team will be there in force with 3 oral presentations:
- 12 September (11:40 - 12:00): Alejandro Osses "Using auditory models to mimic human listeners in reverse correlation experiments from the fastACI toolbox" (hal.science/hal-04186363/docum)
- 13 September (17:20 - 17:40): Laurianne Cabrera "Development of Auditory Sensitivity to Amplitude Modulation Cues: Sensory and Cognitive Determinants and Relationship With Speech Intelligibility"
- 14 September (11:00 - 11:20): Géraldine Carranante "Auditory Reverse Correlation applied to the study of place and voicing: four new phoneme-discrimination tasks" (hal.science/hal-04130939v1/doc)
@psycholinguistics

Our paper presents the results of 2 participants in all 5 phonetic contrasts, revealing their individual listening strategies. The findings align with established auditory cues in psycholinguistic literature while uncovering unexpected secondary cues, enriching our understanding of auditory perception. @psycholinguistics @psycholinguistics

Show thread

This research is at the juncture between , and perception, employing the Auditory () experimental paradigm. This approach unravels the acoustic cues employed by listeners in diverse auditory tasks, shedding light on individual perception strategies. @psycholinguistics

Show thread

Exciting news! Our conference paper titled "Auditory reverse correlation applied to the study of place and voicing: four new phoneme-discrimination tasks" has been accepted for presentation at ! This is the foundation stone for a bigger study to be published next year, and also a summary of our overall scientific aim in the team.
hal.science/hal-04130939

@psycholinguistics

"A Visual Compendium of Auditory Reverse Correlation Studies", updated version! dbao.leo-varnet.fr/2020/12/03/
Short explanation: this is a list of all major studies (to the best of my knowledge) that attempted to use variants of the "reverse correlation" technique to explore auditory perception, from very low-level to high level processes. If you see some important contribution missing, please let me know!
@jj @linguistics

Show thread

When you want to show the classic categorical perception results from Liberman et al but you are too tired to explain what formants are... @linguistics

Pour commencer, deux articles qui présentent de façon vulgarisée la méthode qui est au centre de mes recherches : la corrélation inverse ( ou pour les intimes).
Dans le premier billet je décris la philosophie de cette approche ("Le cerveau comme boîte noire" dbao.leo-varnet.fr/2018/11/29/).
Dans le deuxième, je parle de la façon dont elle peut être appliquée à l'étude de la perception de la parole ("A la recherche des indices acoustiques de la parole" dbao.leo-varnet.fr/2019/05/25/).

Show thread

Puisque j'ai maintenant migré essentiellement sur mastodon, il est temps de déménager mes affaires ici ! Voici un fil où je listerai les billets publiés sur mon blog dbao.leo-varnet.fr/ (essentiellement de la vulgarisation scientifique sur la , les , l' , et parfois les en général) ⬇️

Our new study is about to be submitted! We demonstrate that the effect of a background noise on is multifaceted, even in the case of a simple stationary white noise. You can find the on @biorxivpreprint (biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/20), the raw and processed data on (zenodo.org/record/7476407#.Y67), and the document on (osf.io/4ju3f/). @psycholinguistics

@linguistics Bon j'entend uniquement "oh fuck" donc difficile d'analyser le phénomène, mais je pense que l'illusion auditive est finalement plus simple que celle du Laurel/Yanny : même si Barbie et fuck ont l'air de mots très différents, leur syllabe accentuée est phonétiquement assez proche (b/f diffèrent essentiellement par le mode d'occlusion, et j'entends un /u/ très ouvert à la limite du /ə/). Du coup avec une prononciation approximative il ne me semble pas impossible que les deux soient interchangeables.

Show thread
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.