So many people want to promote absolute anarchism or absolute communism- but either dont care or dont realize the consequences of such a transition... not to mention such things could-not and never-have existed, only contemplated.

There is not a single first-world country with a "pure" philosophical form of governance(or lack thereof in one particular case). World trade and global influence has 'muddied the waters' to such drinking holes.

In reality- what currently exists is an amalgamation of multiple philosophies due to multiple factors(eg. multiple political parties).
-----------------------------
From the posts I've read of the people I follow, there are occasions of where people on both sides of the fence wish for the other for at least one point in time.
======================
The one thing all sides have in common, is the the desire to rise above perceived oppression. To gain control from groups that are not aligned with certain intentions.

________________________________
Either way, such matters are outside of my explicit control- I can only 'rant' or 'vote'. I hold no value(if you can call it that) otherwise outside of that. Neither of which seems to matter on my own part but I do so anyway to warrant the 'I did my part' badge.
++++++++
Either way, there isn't a politician who will personally care about a random citizen in the same 'idealistic' regard as wished within such aspirational conjectures. And for those who wish forms of infrastructure without such positions- the liability of the governed falls then upon themselves; I for one, have no faith in anyone- so would have constant fear of all and thus reason to arm/defend myself at the slightest sneeze.

-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
can we get back to reality and address what's scientifically proven to be at-hand?