Back when I was working on the board of the CBLDF I got very used to the idea of material for adults being challenged by people who thought comics were for children. The idea of books aimed at children being challenged just because they had positive black characters was unimaginable. The world's changed.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/comics/2023/04/08/jerry-craft-new-kid-school-trip-book-ban/
The books could be kept on the shelves if:
a list is provided to parents, opening teachers to attack and lawsuits from previous exposure
the books are reviewed for content, but the language in the law allows for differences in opinion to turn into lawsuits against both the district and the teacher
a permission slip is signed for a student to read a specific book
Under cover of night, Romeo (age 16) and Juliet (age 13) consummate their marriage. Hard not to admit it includes "content involving human reproduction or sexual matters" when the price of failure is a felony. If adopted curriculum (Gatsby, Mockingbird, 1984, Giver, Outsiders), stuff read by most students in US public schools over the last 40 years isn't considered safe anymore, modern young adult fiction doesn't stand a chance. 📚💔
Might I add that the bible, biology books, national geographic, encyclopedias and other books are now in contempt by this standard.
But, this was never about being correct- it was about making people happy. But no one ever was- nor will be.
@rmquist @knapjack @neilhimself
When there were adult magazines in my household, I found them and 'read' them without permission. I was told not to read them, but did so anyway. They didn't make them go away.
When my guardians eventually realized that there was no stopping my exposure to things they didn't want me to be around, they begrudgingly had to step up and start talking to me about various subjects on a case by case basis.
@rmquist @lucifargundam @knapjack @neilhimself ah, but that would expose them to different ideas and viewpoints and possible attempts at empathy and christians just can't have that.
@FlorriePuddlefoot @lucifargundam @knapjack @neilhimself What so many "christians" fail to remember is that Christianity was founded on ideas and viewpoints that differed from the "establishment" ... not the least of which is to love one another... and you can't truly love what you don't know...
Nah! It's much easier to just have a fit and have the book banned so no one can even mention it to their child.
@Catmama @lucifargundam @knapjack @neilhimself I wish I could disagree with you...but I don't like being wrong 😄 It's part of the "if we don't acknowledge it, it doesn't exist" school of parenting....
@rmquist @lucifargundam @knapjack @neilhimself and you know, I had a great time listening to audio books with my sons and discussing the books. We listened to Starship Troopers and The Forever War and talked about the differing views of war. We listened to Frankenstein and talked about what it meant to be human. Books are a wonderful way to connect with people!
@FlorriePuddlefoot @rmquist @knapjack @neilhimself
Imagine that- having civil discussions as a means to understand and get along with each other...
@lucifargundam @knapjack @neilhimself Here's a crazy thought: how about, if you don't like a book/don't want your child to read a book ... just don't read it/make it available to them... BUT... if the book is required reading for school then you read it with your child, and have a discussion with them about what you find objectionable or concerning