Show newer

The social media world is filled with people just pulling ideas out of their asses and hoping it all works out.

Folks who have been around the block a few times in a governance role have started amassing a body of lore. Case studies, observations they made in the trenches.

At the very least, availing oneself of what they have to share is a good first step.

But if we were to take this seriously as engineering, well, that suggests a few things, doesn't it?

It suggest we get a little bit more sciency about this. It suggests we start imposing a little bit of rigor.

🧵

Show thread

@siderea in the commercial world they call it "community management". Without the context this term is as good as equivalent to "social engineering"

@siderea in this line of thought, don't you agree that the pluralism (as in democracy, and as in free market) afforded by decentralisation, is a big problem-solver? Some instances will fail, others will thrive. Some people will drop out, others will stick... and this is where the rest of your discourse tells the rest.

A lot of people, especially on the Fediverse, wind up being governance parties precisely because they don't want to be disempowered anymore. They want to be the people who make decisions about how to solve social problems on their social media platform of choice, and Mastodon/etc makes that much easier than trying to get a job with Twitter's Trust and Safety team.

So it's worth remembering if you are a governance party on the Fediverse, that's great for you, you're all empowered by that arrangement – but your end users are still end users. They get search if you choose to give them search. They still rely on your sitting in judgment of the reports they file on other users to take action on bad actors on their instance. They still experience themselves as largely just as disempowered as they were on Twitter. They have a choice of what lord's fields to till, but they're still peasants.

🧵

Show thread

@siderea this is how I met the admin of my instance: They threatened to block me because someone else reported I'm too passive and thus probably a bot reposting from somewhere else.

@craftycat @Remittancegirl hello again! I came across a very interesting thread that I think might help us understand each other better by reducing the personal stakes:
universeodon.com/@siderea/1114
I really hope you share at least this view with me.

The established users, who are still within their own social bubbles, have an experience that feels to them like, "OMG, where did all these jerks come from? The people responsible for running this place should do something to fix it – things were fine here the other day, they need to just make things like they used to be. How hard could it be?" They are only aware of the problems that they encounter personally, or are reported to them socially by other users or through news media coverage of their platform.

But the parties responsible for governance get the fire hose turned on them: they get to hear ALL the complaints. They get an eagle's eye view of the breadth and diversity and extent of problems.

Where individual users see one problem, and don't think it's particularly difficult to solve, the governance parties see a huge number of problems, all at once, such that even if they were easy to solve, it would still be overwhelming just from numbers.

🧵

Show thread

@siderea this is also entirely true for nation states. E.g. in Europe typically northern countries are wealthier, but in many cases this has to do with a homogeneous society. Nowadays this model breaks, but so do stereotypes of what it means to be German or Finnish (just examples).

@siderea this is actually not true anymore. Traditionally viruses were written for fun as described here. By now it has become a very lucrative business. Once a system is compromised, there are a number of ways to monetise from it, depending on what system it is. Certainly ransomware and botnets are two widespread businesses.

These results are indicative of a deeply troubled society – a fundamentally unhealthy social and political culture. This is a national emergency, and a healthy polity would mobilize all available resources of the state and civil society in an all-out effort to reverse those trends. 8/

Show thread

"Bylines exist for a reason: they give credit where it's due, and just as importantly, they let readers hold writers accountable." 💯 Props to Maggie Harrison and colleagues at Futurism for documenting this:

futurism.com/sports-illustrate

Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo is leaving X, blaming it for "destroying our democracies" — coming after major advertisers exited following owner Elon Musk's endorsement of an antisemitic conspiracy theory.

t.co/yM12pd6xxV

The rate of civilian deaths in Gaza during the Israel-Hamas war is outpacing those of other conflict zones in the 21st century. t.co/zypC2V2Vcc

@Gert secondo me non ti serve lavorare con il stack di OpenGL direttamente. È un livello troppo basso. Ti proporrei SDL come alternativa. Al tempo era l'alternativa FOSS di DirectX, ha preso una sua strada e sempre si utilizza tantissimo per giochi. libsdl.org/

@ECONdailycharts How did they even come up with such a measure? Completely pointless...

@ianwelsh the problem is that an autocratic state cannot be an alternative to a (even if mostly by pretense) a democratic one. Intelligent people around the world aspire to freedom, not resourcefulness of home-grown oligarchs.

Show older
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.