RT @mdredze@twitter.com
The @aclmeeting@twitter.com policy on AI Writing Assistants is excellent. It is detailed, thoughtful, and informative.
Well done!
RT @rochowanski@twitter.com
I've been frustrated, depressed and alarmed at this "what's wrong with Russians for not rising up" debate, which I find dishonest, venal and dangerous. Since it's not going away, I took a stab at it. With lots of personal stories from Russia and beyond.⬇️
https://discomfortzone.substack.com/p/un-russian-revolutions?utm_source=twitter&sd=pf
🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/rochowanski/status/1613026241484935173
RT @KordingLab@twitter.com
I know I publish too many papers. But some of my colleagues publish 100 papers a year: e.g. https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=1GQSnmwAAAAJ&view_op=list_works&sortby=pubdate and there are assistant professors who publish >50. Seems widespread (https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06185-8) Is this a good development? How do people even do that?
🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/KordingLab/status/1611125983263981568
The public discourse about #freedomOfSpeech in #Russia is so low that @navalny@twitter.com defends himself from accusations by threatening academics. Apparently projects himself in some future very powerful position
RT @kamilkazani@twitter.com
@albats@twitter.com @navalny@twitter.com @navalny@twitter.com respond with another ad hominem attack against a critic who pointed out to a verifiable fact. @albats@twitter.com left him a loophole to deny it, while saving his face - the inaccurate description. But Navalny resorts to lies and ad hominem slander
🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/kamilkazani/status/1611429386649014273
RT @fchollet@twitter.com
The current climate in AI has so many parallels to 2021 web3 it's making me uncomfortable. Narratives based on zero data are accepted as self-evident. Everyone is expecting as a sure thing "civilization-altering" impact (& 100x returns on investment) in the next 2-3 years
“The essence of bullshit is not that it is false but that it is phony. In order to appreciate this distinction, one must recognize that a fake or a phony need not be in any respect, apart from authenticity itself, inferior to the real thing. What is not genuine may not also be defective in some other way. It may be, after all, an exact copy. What is wrong with a counterfeit is not what it is like, but how it was made.”
attributed to "On Bullshit" by Harry Frankfurt
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/06/podcasts/transcript-ezra-klein-interviews-gary-marcus.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare
RT @mikeev@twitter.com
Anyone interested in or involved with AI: please listen to @ezraklein@twitter.com's excellent discussion with @GaryMarcus@twitter.com about ChatGPT. I can't recommend it enough:
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/06/opinion/ezra-klein-podcast-gary-marcus.html https://twitter.com/mikeev/status/1600850177065115649
RT @araminta_k@twitter.com
I’ve spoken to so many people who want to get into training models with dreambooth. There is often a breakdown, however, when they try to figure out how to pull together a dataset. I have a helpful analogy thread:
Images made on @Scenario_gg@twitter.com #aiart
🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/araminta_k/status/1611527343046008833
RT @goldsteinricky@twitter.com
If @Harvard@twitter.com feels empowered to block a slam-dunk candidate @KenRoth@twitter.com over Israel criticism, imagine the chilling effect across academia on lesser-known -- and particularly Palestinian -- critics of Israeli repression. https://pen.org/press-release/pen-america-expresses-dismay-over-harvards-denial-of-fellowship-to-former-human-watch-executive-director-ken-roth/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=social-pug
🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/goldsteinricky/status/1611417978524028929
The Crypto wars are not over. Governments regularly try to weaken public encryption tools.
In this week's newsletter, I interview @Mer__edith, president of Signal encrypted messaging app about how we got here.
If Signal was a pen-maker, she said, no one would expect it to turn over all the writing generated by its pens.
"I don’t think we have much of a chance for a livable future if we don’t have a truly private means to communicate with each other."
https://themarkup.org/hello-world/2023/01/07/back-into-the-trenches-of-the-crypto-wars
RT @ylecun@twitter.com
If language were sufficient to express human thought, why would we need visual arts, music, dance?
RT @AclSigedu@twitter.com
We are thrilled to announce that the 18th edition of the BEA workshop will take place at @aclmeeting@twitter.com 2023 in Toronto, Canada on July 13 or 14.
https://sig-edu.org/news/bea18-announcement/
🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/AclSigedu/status/1604839411077652480
RT @ttasovac@twitter.com
Now that Atom is definitely dead, I've made the long overdue switch to VSCode, which is excellent. You have no idea how excited lexiconerds can get over niche party favorites à la built-in Unicode homoglyph detection. Farewell, invisibly messy Cyrillic word lists! Hello, bliss!
Wonderful piece in Ars Technica by @b which (despite the title) talks very broadly about the fediverse, including but also far beyond just Mastodon, and has quite a few quotes from me in it: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/12/mastodon-highlights-pros-and-cons-of-moving-beyond-big-tech-gatekeepers/
Did you know that whether students believe that intellectual abilities are fixed or capable of growth is related to family background and school achievement?
Elin Svensen shows that students believing that intellectual capabilities can grow have parents with longer educations. In contrast, a mindset viewing intellectual capabilities as fixed is associated with lower achievement in high school.
Read more in this open access article: https://doi.org/10.1177/00016993221145427
@socialwork @edutooters @sociology
I guess this is just another example of how @nytimes@twitter.com and @washingtonpost@twitter.com are not the quality media they pretend to be. And maybe of why the independence-asuring model of the @guardian@twitter.com is not something exotic, but a necessity
RT @mer__edith@twitter.com
The op-ed works to create the appearance of a “debate” on more or less settled issues. This is a powerful function, bolstered by the NYT imprimatur, which allows it serve as a “Potemkin citation” -- a seemingly credible reference in support of bad privacy laws and platforms. 4/
🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/mer__edith/status/1610318887068860416
OK let’s talk about That Op-ed. The one that insisted not only that privacy is dangerous, but that not affirmatively building surveillance into communication tools is a radical ideological position.
Dunking on the op-ed’s arguments is easy. They’re SHALLOW. And dunk many have, often with the gentleness of a professor grading a draft essay from a student they didn’t want to completely discourage. I’ll direct you to the great threads from others...
RT @mer__edith@twitter.com
The op-ed works to create the appearance of a “debate” on more or less settled issues. This is a powerful function, bolstered by the NYT imprimatur, which allows it serve as a “Potemkin citation” -- a seemingly credible reference in support of bad privacy laws and platforms. 4/
🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/mer__edith/status/1610318887068860416
Studying how people interact, in the past (#CulturalAnalytics) and today (#EdTech #Crowdsourcing). Researcher at @IslabUnimi, University of Milan. Bulgarian activist for legal reform with @pravosadiezv. I use dedicated accounts for different languages.
My profile is searchable with https://www.tootfinder.ch/ #fedi22