Follow

"Open science is defined as pertaining to (1) accessibility and reusability of *outcomes* as well as (2) the opening up of the *process* of knowledge creation and as well as (3) *public engagement*: open science is defined as pertaining to accessibility and reusability of *outcomes* as well as the opening up of the *process* of knowledge creation and as well as *public engagement*. Therefore, (a) any attempt to push any of these issues against each other is a trick; (b) patents have nothing to do with open science. is.gd/gI6l3T

"Free science" or just "open Science"?! That is the question!

Not just science?

@mcp_

@Firaas Interesting remark. I believe that openness is a necessary but not sufficient condition of scientific freedom. Because a closed "science" could also be more easily constrained, in the darkness.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.