Follow

@wactbprot
Yes great lecture about calculus and .

When I tried to program the AND combinator in I failed. Maybe because of the static type system but more likely because of my inability?

Is there a simple solution for AND: (\p q -> p q p ) in ?

This is as far as I got:

tr :: a -> b -> a
tr = \p q -> p
fs :: a -> b -> b
fs = \p q -> q

and' = \p q -> p q fs
or' = \p q -> p tr q
-- ghci> or' tr fs True False
-- True
-- ghci> and' tr fs True False
-- False

-- and'' = \p q -> p q p -- does not work
-- or'' = \p q -> p p q -- does not work

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.