Thinking about the news and also the one time I had to make a deposition in an intellectual property case.

Through the discovery process, the plaintiff had our calendars. They combed through and found one meeting they decided was the important one. I have no idea what criteria they used to select it. And then their lawyer quizzes me for 20 minutes about this meeting which as far as I was concerned was just one random meeting out of a hundred and about which I had no recollection.

"No I don't remember this meeting." "No, I don't know if X attended." "I don't know if Y attended." "I don't know if Z attended." "Even though I don't remember, I have no reason to believe X didn't attend if they were listed as an attendee." "I have no reason to believe Y didn't attend." ...

What a ridiculous time and energy wasting process!

BTW After answering that many questions about something I didn't remember I started building an imaginary picture of it in my head. It's a bit unnerving because that image is stronger than any memory I might have had about the meeting itself. It's hard to be a witness about something even just a couple of years earlier.

Follow

@dpiponi that's how witnesses become convinced they remember something that never happened. I watched a tv show about memory that had such experiment. It was concerning.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.