@jwz This would not be so much of an issue if Chrome and others simply ditched the labels “incognito” and “private browsing”. It should only be thought as just a temporary instance of a browser at best.

Maybe some label that implies you are doing transient browsing in a temporary sandbox, but still explain that your data isn’t actually extra private or safe.

@cary @jwz I remember when Incognito was picked as a name.

It made perfect sense at the time: short, simple to say and understand, and directly applied to the threat model most people at the time imagined: data leakage on a shared terminal at a library, Internet café, or in the home.

The term's expected meaning drifted as people began to think of the threat model being MITM observation and server-side; when Chrome came out, the story was client-side.

@mtomczak @cary @jwz I’ll correct that typo. What’s wrong with simply using DuckDuckGo?

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.